Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Artificiell intelligens som beslutsstöd – Rätten till motiverade beslut i civilrättsliga processer

Cokalic, Emilia LU (2025) LAGF03 20251
Department of Law
Faculty of Law
Abstract (Swedish)
I takt med att artificiell intelligens (AI) får en allt större roll inom offentlig förvaltning och rättsväsende väcks frågor om hur teknikens användning för-håller sig till grundläggande rättssäkerhetsprinciper. Denna uppsats granskar hur domstolars och myndigheters motiveringsskyldighet enligt artikel 6 i Europakonventionen påverkas när generativ AI används som stöd vid besluts-fattande i civilrättsliga processer. Med fokus på AI-teknikens utmaningar – särskilt bristande transparens och kontroll – analyseras dessa i ljuset av Euro-padomstolens praxis samt svensk rätt. Analysen visar att även om generativ AI har potential att effektivisera rättsskipningen, saknas idag tillräcklig kon-troll för att AI ska kunna tillämpas brett inom... (More)
I takt med att artificiell intelligens (AI) får en allt större roll inom offentlig förvaltning och rättsväsende väcks frågor om hur teknikens användning för-håller sig till grundläggande rättssäkerhetsprinciper. Denna uppsats granskar hur domstolars och myndigheters motiveringsskyldighet enligt artikel 6 i Europakonventionen påverkas när generativ AI används som stöd vid besluts-fattande i civilrättsliga processer. Med fokus på AI-teknikens utmaningar – särskilt bristande transparens och kontroll – analyseras dessa i ljuset av Euro-padomstolens praxis samt svensk rätt. Analysen visar att även om generativ AI har potential att effektivisera rättsskipningen, saknas idag tillräcklig kon-troll för att AI ska kunna tillämpas brett inom civilrätten. Däremot kan den vara användbar i ärendevolymtunga verksamheter där besluten bygger tydliga och objektiva kriterier. AI kan bli ett kraftfullt stöd för rättsväsendet och of-fentliga verksamheter men dess användning kräver öppenhet, mänsklig kon-troll och förklarbarhet för att inte riskera att civilrättsliga beslut uppfattas som ogenomträngliga och påverkbara. (Less)
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) assumes an increasingly significant role in public administration and the judiciary, questions arise regarding how its use aligns with fundamental principles of legal certainty and the rule of law. This thesis examines how courts’ and public authorities’ duty to provide reasoned deci-sions under Article 6 of the European Convention is affected when generative AI is used as a decision-support tool in civil proceedings. Focusing on the challenges posed by AI – particularly the lack of transparency and control – these issues are analysed in the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and Swedish legislation. The analysis demonstrates that while generative AI has the potential to streamline... (More)
As artificial intelligence (AI) assumes an increasingly significant role in public administration and the judiciary, questions arise regarding how its use aligns with fundamental principles of legal certainty and the rule of law. This thesis examines how courts’ and public authorities’ duty to provide reasoned deci-sions under Article 6 of the European Convention is affected when generative AI is used as a decision-support tool in civil proceedings. Focusing on the challenges posed by AI – particularly the lack of transparency and control – these issues are analysed in the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and Swedish legislation. The analysis demonstrates that while generative AI has the potential to streamline judicial processes, there is cur-rently insufficient oversight for its broad application in civil law contexts. However, it may be suitable in high-volume administrative settings where decisions are based on clear and objective criteria. AI can serve as a powerful tool for the judiciary and public authorities, but its use demands transparency, human oversight, and explainability to avoid the risk of civil judgements being perceived as opaque or unchallengeable. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Cokalic, Emilia LU
supervisor
organization
course
LAGF03 20251
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
processrätt, AI, domsmotivering, tvistemål, rättssäkerhet, beslutsstöd, transparens, Europakonventionen
language
Swedish
id
9190396
date added to LUP
2025-06-23 12:16:35
date last changed
2025-06-23 12:16:35
@misc{9190396,
  abstract     = {{As artificial intelligence (AI) assumes an increasingly significant role in public administration and the judiciary, questions arise regarding how its use aligns with fundamental principles of legal certainty and the rule of law. This thesis examines how courts’ and public authorities’ duty to provide reasoned deci-sions under Article 6 of the European Convention is affected when generative AI is used as a decision-support tool in civil proceedings. Focusing on the challenges posed by AI – particularly the lack of transparency and control – these issues are analysed in the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and Swedish legislation. The analysis demonstrates that while generative AI has the potential to streamline judicial processes, there is cur-rently insufficient oversight for its broad application in civil law contexts. However, it may be suitable in high-volume administrative settings where decisions are based on clear and objective criteria. AI can serve as a powerful tool for the judiciary and public authorities, but its use demands transparency, human oversight, and explainability to avoid the risk of civil judgements being perceived as opaque or unchallengeable.}},
  author       = {{Cokalic, Emilia}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Artificiell intelligens som beslutsstöd – Rätten till motiverade beslut i civilrättsliga processer}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}