En skjuten Donald Trump
(2025) STVA23 20251Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This study explores how three major American newspapers – The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and USA Today – portrayed Donald Trump in the immediate context of the assassination attempt on July 13, 2024. Using a qualitative content analysis complemented by simple quantitative coding, the research examines articles published the day before and the day after the event. The findings reveal significant variation in tone, framing, and ideological positioning between the newspapers, with clear distinctions both before and after the attack. Liberal-leaning The New York Times maintained a predominantly critical stance, even post-incident, emphasizing Trump’s perceived threats to democratic values. In contrast, the conservative Wall... (More)
- This study explores how three major American newspapers – The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and USA Today – portrayed Donald Trump in the immediate context of the assassination attempt on July 13, 2024. Using a qualitative content analysis complemented by simple quantitative coding, the research examines articles published the day before and the day after the event. The findings reveal significant variation in tone, framing, and ideological positioning between the newspapers, with clear distinctions both before and after the attack. Liberal-leaning The New York Times maintained a predominantly critical stance, even post-incident, emphasizing Trump’s perceived threats to democratic values. In contrast, the conservative Wall Street Journal shifted markedly toward sympathetic and heroic portrayals, framing Trump as a symbol of strength and resilience. The ideologically moderate USA Today largely retained a neutral tone, though it too demonstrated a subtle increase in positive coverage after the attack. The results support the polarization hypothesis, suggesting that even during moments of national crisis, media outlets reinforce pre-existing ideological divisions rather than converge around a unifying narrative. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9190583
- author
- Byrelid, Anna LU and Asserlind Jönsson, Elsa LU
- supervisor
-
- Orlanda Siow LU
- organization
- course
- STVA23 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- L2 - 2nd term paper (old degree order)
- subject
- keywords
- Donald Trump, Tonläge, Mordförsök, Amerikanska tidningsartiklar, Ideologisk profil, Framing.
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9190583
- date added to LUP
- 2025-08-07 17:01:47
- date last changed
- 2025-08-07 17:01:47
@misc{9190583, abstract = {{This study explores how three major American newspapers – The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and USA Today – portrayed Donald Trump in the immediate context of the assassination attempt on July 13, 2024. Using a qualitative content analysis complemented by simple quantitative coding, the research examines articles published the day before and the day after the event. The findings reveal significant variation in tone, framing, and ideological positioning between the newspapers, with clear distinctions both before and after the attack. Liberal-leaning The New York Times maintained a predominantly critical stance, even post-incident, emphasizing Trump’s perceived threats to democratic values. In contrast, the conservative Wall Street Journal shifted markedly toward sympathetic and heroic portrayals, framing Trump as a symbol of strength and resilience. The ideologically moderate USA Today largely retained a neutral tone, though it too demonstrated a subtle increase in positive coverage after the attack. The results support the polarization hypothesis, suggesting that even during moments of national crisis, media outlets reinforce pre-existing ideological divisions rather than converge around a unifying narrative.}}, author = {{Byrelid, Anna and Asserlind Jönsson, Elsa}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{En skjuten Donald Trump}}, year = {{2025}}, }