ESG Rating Disagreement and the Green Bond Premium: Evidence from the European Corporate Bond Market
(2025) NEKP01 20251Department of Economics
- Abstract
- This thesis investigates the existence of a green bond premium, or greenium, in
the European corporate bond market. It examines how ESG disagreements affect
this premium. By utilising secondary market data for 515 green bonds and 2.325
conventional bonds issued between 2018 and 2025, a matching methodology based
on Zerbib (2019) is employed to isolate the yield differential attributed to the green
label. The analysis reveals a statistically significant greenium of approximately
15,2 basis points, indicating that green bonds tend to trade at lower yields than
comparable conventional bonds, consistent with theories of taste-based preferences
and signalling. However, the premium diminishes with increased ESG rating disagreement,
as... (More) - This thesis investigates the existence of a green bond premium, or greenium, in
the European corporate bond market. It examines how ESG disagreements affect
this premium. By utilising secondary market data for 515 green bonds and 2.325
conventional bonds issued between 2018 and 2025, a matching methodology based
on Zerbib (2019) is employed to isolate the yield differential attributed to the green
label. The analysis reveals a statistically significant greenium of approximately
15,2 basis points, indicating that green bonds tend to trade at lower yields than
comparable conventional bonds, consistent with theories of taste-based preferences
and signalling. However, the premium diminishes with increased ESG rating disagreement,
as measured by the standard deviation of ESG scores from four major
providers. This suggests that inconsistencies in ESG assessments introduce informational
frictions that reduce investor confidence in green labels and weaken the
associated pricing benefits. These findings emphasise the importance of consistency
in ESG data for effective pricing in sustainable finance markets and carry significant
implications for regulators seeking to enhance ESG transparency and standardisation. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9195229
- author
- Róbertsson, Ragnar Ágúst LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- NEKP01 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- Greenium, ESG, Finance, Economics, Sustainability
- language
- English
- id
- 9195229
- date added to LUP
- 2025-09-12 11:14:54
- date last changed
- 2025-09-12 11:14:54
@misc{9195229, abstract = {{This thesis investigates the existence of a green bond premium, or greenium, in the European corporate bond market. It examines how ESG disagreements affect this premium. By utilising secondary market data for 515 green bonds and 2.325 conventional bonds issued between 2018 and 2025, a matching methodology based on Zerbib (2019) is employed to isolate the yield differential attributed to the green label. The analysis reveals a statistically significant greenium of approximately 15,2 basis points, indicating that green bonds tend to trade at lower yields than comparable conventional bonds, consistent with theories of taste-based preferences and signalling. However, the premium diminishes with increased ESG rating disagreement, as measured by the standard deviation of ESG scores from four major providers. This suggests that inconsistencies in ESG assessments introduce informational frictions that reduce investor confidence in green labels and weaken the associated pricing benefits. These findings emphasise the importance of consistency in ESG data for effective pricing in sustainable finance markets and carry significant implications for regulators seeking to enhance ESG transparency and standardisation.}}, author = {{Róbertsson, Ragnar Ágúst}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{ESG Rating Disagreement and the Green Bond Premium: Evidence from the European Corporate Bond Market}}, year = {{2025}}, }