Beyond Profit: Multinational Corporations, Structural Injustice, and the European Push for Reform
(2025) HARN63 20251Department of Business Law
- Abstract
- This thesis aims to address the complex legal challenges related to the responsibility of multinational corporations for human rights violations and environmental harm in global supply chains. Starting from the context of increasing pressure on transnational businesses and the shortcomings of soft law instruments such as the UN Guiding Principles and the OECD Guidelines, the study examines the potential of the proposed EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The objective is to assess how the CSDDD tackles key issues such as extraterritoriality, access to justice, and corporate liability, also through an analysis of relevant European judicial cases (e.g., Pakistani Victims v. KiK, Okpabi v. Shell, Trafigura). The... (More)
- This thesis aims to address the complex legal challenges related to the responsibility of multinational corporations for human rights violations and environmental harm in global supply chains. Starting from the context of increasing pressure on transnational businesses and the shortcomings of soft law instruments such as the UN Guiding Principles and the OECD Guidelines, the study examines the potential of the proposed EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The objective is to assess how the CSDDD tackles key issues such as extraterritoriality, access to justice, and corporate liability, also through an analysis of relevant European judicial cases (e.g., Pakistani Victims v. KiK, Okpabi v. Shell, Trafigura). The analysis explores how the CSDDD reflects previous EU case law and what impact it may have on access to justice and the harmonization of due diligence obligations. The conclusions indicate that, although the CSDDD represents a significant step forward in introducing binding obligations, limitations in its final scope and the lack of procedural harmonization risk perpetuating legal fragmentation and uneven access to justice for victims. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9196089
- author
- Scatton, Stephanie LU and Baroni, Eliana LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- HARN63 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
- subject
- keywords
- Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, multinational corporations, supply chains, human rights, environmental harms, access to justice, corporate responsibility, extraterritoriality.
- language
- English
- id
- 9196089
- date added to LUP
- 2025-06-10 11:54:46
- date last changed
- 2025-06-10 11:54:46
@misc{9196089, abstract = {{This thesis aims to address the complex legal challenges related to the responsibility of multinational corporations for human rights violations and environmental harm in global supply chains. Starting from the context of increasing pressure on transnational businesses and the shortcomings of soft law instruments such as the UN Guiding Principles and the OECD Guidelines, the study examines the potential of the proposed EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The objective is to assess how the CSDDD tackles key issues such as extraterritoriality, access to justice, and corporate liability, also through an analysis of relevant European judicial cases (e.g., Pakistani Victims v. KiK, Okpabi v. Shell, Trafigura). The analysis explores how the CSDDD reflects previous EU case law and what impact it may have on access to justice and the harmonization of due diligence obligations. The conclusions indicate that, although the CSDDD represents a significant step forward in introducing binding obligations, limitations in its final scope and the lack of procedural harmonization risk perpetuating legal fragmentation and uneven access to justice for victims.}}, author = {{Scatton, Stephanie and Baroni, Eliana}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Beyond Profit: Multinational Corporations, Structural Injustice, and the European Push for Reform}}, year = {{2025}}, }