Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Evaluating In-house vs. Outsourced Electronic Development in the Automotive Industry

Andersson, Svante LU and Lejon, William LU (2025) MIOM05 20251
Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences
Production Management
Abstract
Background: As electronic control units (ECUs) become increasingly complex and central to vehicle functionality, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) face strategic decisions on whether to develop such components in-house or outsource them. These make-or-buy decisions affect not only cost but also innovation potential, lead times, and organizational capability.

Purpose: To evaluate the implications of different levels of supply chain integration in ECU development and provide Scania with insights to guide future development strategies.

Research Questions: (1) What levels of supply chain integration are theoretically possible? (2) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different levels of supply chain integration? (3)... (More)
Background: As electronic control units (ECUs) become increasingly complex and central to vehicle functionality, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) face strategic decisions on whether to develop such components in-house or outsource them. These make-or-buy decisions affect not only cost but also innovation potential, lead times, and organizational capability.

Purpose: To evaluate the implications of different levels of supply chain integration in ECU development and provide Scania with insights to guide future development strategies.

Research Questions: (1) What levels of supply chain integration are theoretically possible? (2) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different levels of supply chain integration? (3) What levels of supply chain integration are practically implementable at a leading commercial vehicle manufacturer’s ECU development? (4) How do the different levels of supply chain integration in the development and production of electronics perform?

Methodology: The study combines a literature review with an embedded single-case study of two internal development groups at Scania. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, internal documentation, and a quantitative simulation of the development of an actual Scania ECU.

Findings: Higher integration levels can reduce development lead times, improve coordination, and strengthen internal capabilities, but require greater organizational investment and alignment. Co-development models may offer a strategic middle ground between efficiency and control.

Key words: Supply Chain Integration, Make-or-Buy, Electronic Control Units, Resource-Based View, Transaction Cost Economics, Automotive Industry (Less)
Popular Abstract
Background: As electronic control units (ECUs) become increasingly complex and central to vehicle functionality, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) face strategic decisions on whether to develop such components in-house or outsource them. These make-or-buy decisions affect not only cost but also innovation potential, lead times, and organizational capability.

Purpose: To evaluate the implications of different levels of supply chain integration in ECU development and provide Scania with insights to guide future development strategies.

Research Questions: (1) What levels of supply chain integration are theoretically possible? (2) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different levels of supply chain integration? (3)... (More)
Background: As electronic control units (ECUs) become increasingly complex and central to vehicle functionality, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) face strategic decisions on whether to develop such components in-house or outsource them. These make-or-buy decisions affect not only cost but also innovation potential, lead times, and organizational capability.

Purpose: To evaluate the implications of different levels of supply chain integration in ECU development and provide Scania with insights to guide future development strategies.

Research Questions: (1) What levels of supply chain integration are theoretically possible? (2) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different levels of supply chain integration? (3) What levels of supply chain integration are practically implementable at a leading commercial vehicle manufacturer’s ECU development? (4) How do the different levels of supply chain integration in the development and production of electronics perform?

Methodology: The study combines a literature review with an embedded single-case study of two internal development groups at Scania. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, internal documentation, and a quantitative simulation of the development of an actual Scania ECU.

Findings: Higher integration levels can reduce development lead times, improve coordination, and strengthen internal capabilities, but require greater organizational investment and alignment. Co-development models may offer a strategic middle ground between efficiency and control.

Key words: Supply Chain Integration, Make-or-Buy, Electronic Control Units, Resource-Based View, Transaction Cost Economics, Automotive Industry (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Andersson, Svante LU and Lejon, William LU
supervisor
organization
course
MIOM05 20251
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Supply Chain Integration, Make-or-Buy, Electronic Control Units, Resource-Based View, Transaction Cost Economics, Automotive Industry
other publication id
25/5326
language
English
id
9204147
date added to LUP
2025-06-23 13:53:24
date last changed
2025-06-23 13:53:24
@misc{9204147,
  abstract     = {{Background: As electronic control units (ECUs) become increasingly complex and central to vehicle functionality, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) face strategic decisions on whether to develop such components in-house or outsource them. These make-or-buy decisions affect not only cost but also innovation potential, lead times, and organizational capability.

Purpose: To evaluate the implications of different levels of supply chain integration in ECU development and provide Scania with insights to guide future development strategies.

Research Questions: (1) What levels of supply chain integration are theoretically possible? (2) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different levels of supply chain integration? (3) What levels of supply chain integration are practically implementable at a leading commercial vehicle manufacturer’s ECU development? (4) How do the different levels of supply chain integration in the development and production of electronics perform?

Methodology: The study combines a literature review with an embedded single-case study of two internal development groups at Scania. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, internal documentation, and a quantitative simulation of the development of an actual Scania ECU.

Findings: Higher integration levels can reduce development lead times, improve coordination, and strengthen internal capabilities, but require greater organizational investment and alignment. Co-development models may offer a strategic middle ground between efficiency and control.

Key words: Supply Chain Integration, Make-or-Buy, Electronic Control Units, Resource-Based View, Transaction Cost Economics, Automotive Industry}},
  author       = {{Andersson, Svante and Lejon, William}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Evaluating In-house vs. Outsourced Electronic Development in the Automotive Industry}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}