Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Runway to Nowhere? Explanatory Reach of Liberal Intergovernmentalism in FCAS Negotiations

Zielinski, Mikael LU and Robertson, Max LU (2026) STVK04 20252
Department of Political Science
Abstract
Building on debates over whether external shocks, notably Russia’s war against Ukraine, drive deeper integration, the study probes claims that defence cooperation is best understood through domestically grounded state preferences and intergovernmental bargaining rather than supranational breakthroughs. The research adopts a qualitative, theory-driven design using minimalist process tracing and diagnostic tests (straw-in-the-wind, hoop, and smoking-gun) to assess LI’s first two stages: national preference formation and interstate bargaining. Empirical analysis is anchored in the French Senate Information Report No. 642 (2020), supplemented by selective official statements and specialist reporting. Findings indicate that FCAS delays are... (More)
Building on debates over whether external shocks, notably Russia’s war against Ukraine, drive deeper integration, the study probes claims that defence cooperation is best understood through domestically grounded state preferences and intergovernmental bargaining rather than supranational breakthroughs. The research adopts a qualitative, theory-driven design using minimalist process tracing and diagnostic tests (straw-in-the-wind, hoop, and smoking-gun) to assess LI’s first two stages: national preference formation and interstate bargaining. Empirical analysis is anchored in the French Senate Information Report No. 642 (2020), supplemented by selective official statements and specialist reporting. Findings indicate that FCAS delays are broadly consistent with LI. States share an overarching interest in cooperation, but diverge on issue-specific distributive questions that map onto domestic industrial structures and political constraints. Bargaining deadlock is driven less by informational scarcity or supranational entrepreneurship than by distributional conflict under asymmetrical interdependence, where delay so far constitutes a more viable strategy than exit. Overall, the study suggests LI plausibly accounts for cooperation dynamics in decentralized, project-based defence initiatives, helping explain why ambitious European defence projects can stall even under strong external pressure and shared strategic narratives. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Zielinski, Mikael LU and Robertson, Max LU
supervisor
organization
course
STVK04 20252
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Liberal Intergovernmentalism, FCAS, Defence integration, Strategic Autonomy, Asymmetric Interdependence, Preference Formation
language
English
id
9216910
date added to LUP
2026-01-26 11:53:31
date last changed
2026-01-26 11:53:31
@misc{9216910,
  abstract     = {{Building on debates over whether external shocks, notably Russia’s war against Ukraine, drive deeper integration, the study probes claims that defence cooperation is best understood through domestically grounded state preferences and intergovernmental bargaining rather than supranational breakthroughs. The research adopts a qualitative, theory-driven design using minimalist process tracing and diagnostic tests (straw-in-the-wind, hoop, and smoking-gun) to assess LI’s first two stages: national preference formation and interstate bargaining. Empirical analysis is anchored in the French Senate Information Report No. 642 (2020), supplemented by selective official statements and specialist reporting. Findings indicate that FCAS delays are broadly consistent with LI. States share an overarching interest in cooperation, but diverge on issue-specific distributive questions that map onto domestic industrial structures and political constraints. Bargaining deadlock is driven less by informational scarcity or supranational entrepreneurship than by distributional conflict under asymmetrical interdependence, where delay so far constitutes a more viable strategy than exit. Overall, the study suggests LI plausibly accounts for cooperation dynamics in decentralized, project-based defence initiatives, helping explain why ambitious European defence projects can stall even under strong external pressure and shared strategic narratives.}},
  author       = {{Zielinski, Mikael and Robertson, Max}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Runway to Nowhere? Explanatory Reach of Liberal Intergovernmentalism in FCAS Negotiations}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}