'Discursive Democracy' - The Case for Deliberation
(2010) STVK01 20102Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This thesis deals with an approach in how to structure global governance, proposed by an Australian political scientist John S. Dryzek, called ‘Discursive democracy’. This thesis presents the approach, goes through the different aspects of it and tries to give the reader a sufficient understanding of the approach.
The thesis offer an evaluation of the approach through a process where the approach is put in contrast to an empirical case. The case, The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and HIV, deals with a deliberation process that resemble many of the features of a ‘Discursive democracy’. The findings in this study indicate that the approach proposed by Dryzek have problems in practice. The case used suggest that some features of... (More) - This thesis deals with an approach in how to structure global governance, proposed by an Australian political scientist John S. Dryzek, called ‘Discursive democracy’. This thesis presents the approach, goes through the different aspects of it and tries to give the reader a sufficient understanding of the approach.
The thesis offer an evaluation of the approach through a process where the approach is put in contrast to an empirical case. The case, The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and HIV, deals with a deliberation process that resemble many of the features of a ‘Discursive democracy’. The findings in this study indicate that the approach proposed by Dryzek have problems in practice. The case used suggest that some features of the approach does not work, and overlooks certain aspects of the deliberative process. Even so, the approach can not be dismissed, as an exact replica of the approach has not been tried in practice. Further research is needed, preferable with a case that, even more so than the case used here, resemble the approached model developed by Dryzek. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1757467
- author
- Karlsson, Joakim LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVK01 20102
- year
- 2010
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- John S. Dryzek, Discursive democracy, deliberation, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, global governance, Tuberculosis and HIV
- language
- English
- id
- 1757467
- date added to LUP
- 2011-02-10 11:14:53
- date last changed
- 2011-02-10 11:14:53
@misc{1757467, abstract = {{This thesis deals with an approach in how to structure global governance, proposed by an Australian political scientist John S. Dryzek, called ‘Discursive democracy’. This thesis presents the approach, goes through the different aspects of it and tries to give the reader a sufficient understanding of the approach. The thesis offer an evaluation of the approach through a process where the approach is put in contrast to an empirical case. The case, The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and HIV, deals with a deliberation process that resemble many of the features of a ‘Discursive democracy’. The findings in this study indicate that the approach proposed by Dryzek have problems in practice. The case used suggest that some features of the approach does not work, and overlooks certain aspects of the deliberative process. Even so, the approach can not be dismissed, as an exact replica of the approach has not been tried in practice. Further research is needed, preferable with a case that, even more so than the case used here, resemble the approached model developed by Dryzek.}}, author = {{Karlsson, Joakim}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{'Discursive Democracy' - The Case for Deliberation}}, year = {{2010}}, }