Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Argument för ansvarsförhållanden på internet : viktiga aktörers ställning till ansvarsförhållanden för mobbning i sociala medier

Pilhage, Erik LU (2013) MRSK30 20131
Human Rights Studies
Abstract
This essay aims to present the way in which relevant organizations in Sweden argues for who's got a responsibility towards children when they're victims of bullying in social medias. This essay does not want to examine if the way we're dealing with children who're victims of cyber bullying is effective or not, nor do I claim to put forward recommendations for a 'better way' to divide responsibly between organizations.
I use argument analysis to highlight the main arguments for who's got responsibility in this context. I examine reports, policies and other documents from Swedish NGO:s working for children's rights, Swedish authorities and the social media network Facebook to answer this essays' question.
I conclude that these... (More)
This essay aims to present the way in which relevant organizations in Sweden argues for who's got a responsibility towards children when they're victims of bullying in social medias. This essay does not want to examine if the way we're dealing with children who're victims of cyber bullying is effective or not, nor do I claim to put forward recommendations for a 'better way' to divide responsibly between organizations.
I use argument analysis to highlight the main arguments for who's got responsibility in this context. I examine reports, policies and other documents from Swedish NGO:s working for children's rights, Swedish authorities and the social media network Facebook to answer this essays' question.
I conclude that these organizations lay most of the responsibly on the schools, parents and the government. Only Facebook puts any responsibility on corporations to work for a safer internet for children. I finish off by analyzing why these organizations don't put responsibly on corporations and what the mayor issues are with the way this question is talked about in my materials. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Pilhage, Erik LU
supervisor
organization
course
MRSK30 20131
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
ansvar, internetmobbning, emobbning, nätmobbning, CSR, Skolverket, Friends, Facebook, BRIS, argumentationsanalys, företagsansvar, Mänskliga rättigheter, Human rights
language
Swedish
id
3803114
date added to LUP
2013-07-18 13:45:15
date last changed
2014-09-04 08:27:44
@misc{3803114,
  abstract     = {{This essay aims to present the way in which relevant organizations in Sweden argues for who's got a responsibility towards children when they're victims of bullying in social medias. This essay does not want to examine if the way we're dealing with children who're victims of cyber bullying is effective or not, nor do I claim to put forward recommendations for a 'better way' to divide responsibly between organizations.
I use argument analysis to highlight the main arguments for who's got responsibility in this context. I examine reports, policies and other documents from Swedish NGO:s working for children's rights, Swedish authorities and the social media network Facebook to answer this essays' question. 
I conclude that these organizations lay most of the responsibly on the schools, parents and the government. Only Facebook puts any responsibility on corporations to work for a safer internet for children. I finish off by analyzing why these organizations don't put responsibly on corporations and what the mayor issues are with the way this question is talked about in my materials.}},
  author       = {{Pilhage, Erik}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Argument för ansvarsförhållanden på internet : viktiga aktörers ställning till ansvarsförhållanden för mobbning i sociala medier}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}