Expert Knowledge within a Prominent Environmental Think Tank
(2014) STVK12 20141Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- The global climate change negotiations are experiencing a rescaling of international actors. Several of these actors are scientific communities that aim at providing policy recommendations based on expert knowledge for the negotiations. The literature within the science-policy nexus is applied to investigate the significance of expert communities however the literature does not target environmental think tanks. For this reason, this thesis aims at exploring 1 of the top 70 environmental think tanks in the world namely Environment for Development by applying the theoretical concept of usable knowledge. With the purpose to give an understanding of what the characteristics of usable knowledge are within Environment for Development. The... (More)
- The global climate change negotiations are experiencing a rescaling of international actors. Several of these actors are scientific communities that aim at providing policy recommendations based on expert knowledge for the negotiations. The literature within the science-policy nexus is applied to investigate the significance of expert communities however the literature does not target environmental think tanks. For this reason, this thesis aims at exploring 1 of the top 70 environmental think tanks in the world namely Environment for Development by applying the theoretical concept of usable knowledge. With the purpose to give an understanding of what the characteristics of usable knowledge are within Environment for Development. The concept reflects on scientific actors' ability to produce expert knowledge by providing a set of requirements that can enhance scientific influence. By analysing Environment for Development’s procedural process as well as their published documents the characteristics of usable knowledge will be investigated. This thesis reaches the conclusion that Environment for Development as a highly ranked environmental think tank, has limited usable knowledge. Therefore there might be reasons to be critical toward Environment for Development and to stress the need for future research to further the understanding of environmental think tanks significance for the international policy process. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/4451301
- author
- Lilja, Nicky LU
- supervisor
-
- Anders Uhlin LU
- organization
- alternative title
- A critical discussion on the characteristics of usable knowledge
- course
- STVK12 20141
- year
- 2014
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- usable knowledge, characteristics, science-policy nexus, environmental think tank, Environment for Development
- language
- English
- id
- 4451301
- date added to LUP
- 2014-06-18 12:21:07
- date last changed
- 2014-06-18 12:21:07
@misc{4451301, abstract = {{The global climate change negotiations are experiencing a rescaling of international actors. Several of these actors are scientific communities that aim at providing policy recommendations based on expert knowledge for the negotiations. The literature within the science-policy nexus is applied to investigate the significance of expert communities however the literature does not target environmental think tanks. For this reason, this thesis aims at exploring 1 of the top 70 environmental think tanks in the world namely Environment for Development by applying the theoretical concept of usable knowledge. With the purpose to give an understanding of what the characteristics of usable knowledge are within Environment for Development. The concept reflects on scientific actors' ability to produce expert knowledge by providing a set of requirements that can enhance scientific influence. By analysing Environment for Development’s procedural process as well as their published documents the characteristics of usable knowledge will be investigated. This thesis reaches the conclusion that Environment for Development as a highly ranked environmental think tank, has limited usable knowledge. Therefore there might be reasons to be critical toward Environment for Development and to stress the need for future research to further the understanding of environmental think tanks significance for the international policy process.}}, author = {{Lilja, Nicky}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Expert Knowledge within a Prominent Environmental Think Tank}}, year = {{2014}}, }