EU Arguments for the Imposition of sanctions
(2016) MRSG31 20161Human Rights Studies
- Abstract
- This essay examines the arguments laid forth by the European Union regarding restrictive measures imposed on the Russian Federation, concerning the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula, in an effort to evaluate and classify these grounded in the Toulmin model of arguments and Giumelli’s concepts of Con-straining, Coercing and Signalling. By assessing the arguments made by four EU institutions, that relate to the imposition of restrictive measures, the author seeks to gain a deeper understanding of how political language is structured and argu-ments developed when faced with a crisis of this character. Dismissing the basic pain-gain logic or goal-oriented policy practice many academics have come to associate with the study of... (More)
- This essay examines the arguments laid forth by the European Union regarding restrictive measures imposed on the Russian Federation, concerning the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula, in an effort to evaluate and classify these grounded in the Toulmin model of arguments and Giumelli’s concepts of Con-straining, Coercing and Signalling. By assessing the arguments made by four EU institutions, that relate to the imposition of restrictive measures, the author seeks to gain a deeper understanding of how political language is structured and argu-ments developed when faced with a crisis of this character. Dismissing the basic pain-gain logic or goal-oriented policy practice many academics have come to associate with the study of sanctions, the essay examines the arguments in light of Giumellis theoretical framework and with the following finding. Attempts at co-ercion and constraining are present but play only a minor role in signalling a cred-ible threat. The main component in the significant package of sanctions is that of signalling. Consequently hampering efforts to create sustainable, reliable and transparent international systems that can coerce state actors even on the anar-chical, but asymmetric international plane. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8888602
- author
- Pashley, Dylan Eiler Christopher LU
- supervisor
-
- Olof Beckman LU
- Rouzbeh Parsi LU
- organization
- course
- MRSG31 20161
- year
- 2016
- type
- L2 - 2nd term paper (old degree order)
- subject
- keywords
- State Coercion, Restrictive Measures, Signalling, European Union, Sanctions, Russia, Crimea, Human Rights, International Relations, Human rigths
- language
- English
- id
- 8888602
- date added to LUP
- 2017-04-04 08:46:58
- date last changed
- 2017-04-04 08:46:58
@misc{8888602, abstract = {{This essay examines the arguments laid forth by the European Union regarding restrictive measures imposed on the Russian Federation, concerning the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula, in an effort to evaluate and classify these grounded in the Toulmin model of arguments and Giumelli’s concepts of Con-straining, Coercing and Signalling. By assessing the arguments made by four EU institutions, that relate to the imposition of restrictive measures, the author seeks to gain a deeper understanding of how political language is structured and argu-ments developed when faced with a crisis of this character. Dismissing the basic pain-gain logic or goal-oriented policy practice many academics have come to associate with the study of sanctions, the essay examines the arguments in light of Giumellis theoretical framework and with the following finding. Attempts at co-ercion and constraining are present but play only a minor role in signalling a cred-ible threat. The main component in the significant package of sanctions is that of signalling. Consequently hampering efforts to create sustainable, reliable and transparent international systems that can coerce state actors even on the anar-chical, but asymmetric international plane.}}, author = {{Pashley, Dylan Eiler Christopher}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{EU Arguments for the Imposition of sanctions}}, year = {{2016}}, }