Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Metaphors and their Making: Bodily, conventionally and contextually motivated metaphors in inter- and intra-generational conversations

Torstensson, Björn LU (2019) SPVR01 20182
Cognitive Semiotics
Master's Programme: Language and Linguistics
Abstract (Swedish)
This thesis examines and compares spontaneous metaphor usage in conversations within and between generations. It investigates to what extent they can be seen as motivated by bodily, conventional and situated factors with the help of the Motivation and Sedimentation Model (MSM), which operates with these three levels of meaning. The model combines and integrates earlier accounts of metaphor motivation, conventionalization and emergence, as shown through a theoretical discussion.
The thesis proposes and employs a detailed MSM-based procedure for linguistic metaphor identification in transcripts from moderated dyadic conversations between participants, thus contributing to MSM specifically with both methodology and new data. The... (More)
This thesis examines and compares spontaneous metaphor usage in conversations within and between generations. It investigates to what extent they can be seen as motivated by bodily, conventional and situated factors with the help of the Motivation and Sedimentation Model (MSM), which operates with these three levels of meaning. The model combines and integrates earlier accounts of metaphor motivation, conventionalization and emergence, as shown through a theoretical discussion.
The thesis proposes and employs a detailed MSM-based procedure for linguistic metaphor identification in transcripts from moderated dyadic conversations between participants, thus contributing to MSM specifically with both methodology and new data. The identification procedure was based on the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), elaborated through elements from the Discourse Dynamics Approach (DDA). It was further aided by MSM’s definition of metaphor based on the notions of iconicity and semantic tension, the latter understood in the present context as polysemy (as opposed to semantic vagueness/generality).
Rather surprisingly, the analysis showed no major quantitative differences in metaphor motivation between inter- and intragenerational conversations among strangers. Conventionality, and in particular strongly sedimented norms, appeared to be the foremost driving factor in metaphor production, both within and between generations, while the younger generation had a slight preference for weakly sedimented metaphors.
In sum, the thesis contributes to metaphor studies theoretically and methodologically and calls for better inter-study comparability through higher methodological transparency and conceptual clarity. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Torstensson, Björn LU
supervisor
organization
course
SPVR01 20182
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
cognitive semiotics, iconicity, Motivation and Sedimentation Model, conventionality, embodiment, metaphor identification, signs, polysemy
language
English
id
8992841
date added to LUP
2019-08-26 08:44:36
date last changed
2019-11-07 10:45:26
@misc{8992841,
  abstract     = {{This thesis examines and compares spontaneous metaphor usage in conversations within and between generations. It investigates to what extent they can be seen as motivated by bodily, conventional and situated factors with the help of the Motivation and Sedimentation Model (MSM), which operates with these three levels of meaning. The model combines and integrates earlier accounts of metaphor motivation, conventionalization and emergence, as shown through a theoretical discussion.
The thesis proposes and employs a detailed MSM-based procedure for linguistic metaphor identification in transcripts from moderated dyadic conversations between participants, thus contributing to MSM specifically with both methodology and new data. The identification procedure was based on the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), elaborated through elements from the Discourse Dynamics Approach (DDA). It was further aided by MSM’s definition of metaphor based on the notions of iconicity and semantic tension, the latter understood in the present context as polysemy (as opposed to semantic vagueness/generality). 
Rather surprisingly, the analysis showed no major quantitative differences in metaphor motivation between inter- and intragenerational conversations among strangers. Conventionality, and in particular strongly sedimented norms, appeared to be the foremost driving factor in metaphor production, both within and between generations, while the younger generation had a slight preference for weakly sedimented metaphors. 
In sum, the thesis contributes to metaphor studies theoretically and methodologically and calls for better inter-study comparability through higher methodological transparency and conceptual clarity.}},
  author       = {{Torstensson, Björn}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Metaphors and their Making: Bodily, conventionally and contextually motivated metaphors in inter- and intra-generational conversations}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}