Marin insats i Libanon 2006 - Varför blev det så?
(2021) STVU15 20211Department of Political Science
- Abstract (Swedish)
- The 13th of October 2006, the Swedish parliament approved a change in the
Foreign Policy. For the first time the Government choose to use a maritime unit in peace-time operations. This had never been done before. The Swedish navy was trained and ready for this, due to the new overall policy, regarding the Armed Forces of Sweden from 2004. The aim of this study is to analyse the process of agenda setting and see how the different policy’s suggestions are picked up, analysed and left, until there is only one policy suggestion that fills the requirement. The analysis is based upon Kingdon’s multiple streams framework theory (2011). Relevant material for the study was collected through text analysis of official documents and interviews with... (More) - The 13th of October 2006, the Swedish parliament approved a change in the
Foreign Policy. For the first time the Government choose to use a maritime unit in peace-time operations. This had never been done before. The Swedish navy was trained and ready for this, due to the new overall policy, regarding the Armed Forces of Sweden from 2004. The aim of this study is to analyse the process of agenda setting and see how the different policy’s suggestions are picked up, analysed and left, until there is only one policy suggestion that fills the requirement. The analysis is based upon Kingdon’s multiple streams framework theory (2011). Relevant material for the study was collected through text analysis of official documents and interviews with persons who were the key actors in the changes policy. The outcome of this study shows, that, in the end, it is not the most obvious policy’s suggestion that will be used, but rather the one that fits in the political framework at a given moment, like The Armed Forces´ suggestion was demonstrated to be implementable. The Swedish contribution was small but still important one, both in terms of domestic and foreign policy. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9044205
- author
- Tirén Beckholmen, Lennart LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVU15 20211
- year
- 2021
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Libanon, UNIFIL, ML01, Marinen, John Kingdon, MSF
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9044205
- date added to LUP
- 2021-06-04 14:22:34
- date last changed
- 2021-06-04 14:22:34
@misc{9044205, abstract = {{The 13th of October 2006, the Swedish parliament approved a change in the Foreign Policy. For the first time the Government choose to use a maritime unit in peace-time operations. This had never been done before. The Swedish navy was trained and ready for this, due to the new overall policy, regarding the Armed Forces of Sweden from 2004. The aim of this study is to analyse the process of agenda setting and see how the different policy’s suggestions are picked up, analysed and left, until there is only one policy suggestion that fills the requirement. The analysis is based upon Kingdon’s multiple streams framework theory (2011). Relevant material for the study was collected through text analysis of official documents and interviews with persons who were the key actors in the changes policy. The outcome of this study shows, that, in the end, it is not the most obvious policy’s suggestion that will be used, but rather the one that fits in the political framework at a given moment, like The Armed Forces´ suggestion was demonstrated to be implementable. The Swedish contribution was small but still important one, both in terms of domestic and foreign policy.}}, author = {{Tirén Beckholmen, Lennart}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Marin insats i Libanon 2006 - Varför blev det så?}}, year = {{2021}}, }