Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The Doctrine of Equivalence in Patent Law - A Comparative Study in Different Jurisdictions

Checchio Pessoa, Ingrid LU (2021) HARN63 20211
Department of Business Law
Abstract
In the field of patent law, the doctrine of equivalence extends the scope of a patent beyond its literal language to cover inconsequential variations of a patentable invention. This doctrine is arguably one of the most important aspects of patent law. The protection a patent confers is meaningless if its scope is determined to be so narrow that trivial changes to a device bring it out of the bounds of the patent. One of the greatest challenges courts and legislatures therefore face in patent law is to create rules for determining patent scope that maintain the protection a patent is meant to confer while still keeping the patent monopoly within reasonable bounds.
Despite the general unity in patent laws among developed countries, the... (More)
In the field of patent law, the doctrine of equivalence extends the scope of a patent beyond its literal language to cover inconsequential variations of a patentable invention. This doctrine is arguably one of the most important aspects of patent law. The protection a patent confers is meaningless if its scope is determined to be so narrow that trivial changes to a device bring it out of the bounds of the patent. One of the greatest challenges courts and legislatures therefore face in patent law is to create rules for determining patent scope that maintain the protection a patent is meant to confer while still keeping the patent monopoly within reasonable bounds.
Despite the general unity in patent laws among developed countries, the difficulty of this task has led to different results in different jurisdictions. Many jurisdictions have chosen to determine patent scope under a doctrine of equivalence, while others have maintained the position that adequate scope can be found within the meaning of a patent's claim. Even jurisdictions which agree that a doctrine of equivalence should apply differ significantly in its application.
This thesis provides an examination of the doctrine of equivalence from the perspective of three different jurisdictions – The United States, Germany and the United Kingdom – and their separate answers to the question of patent scope. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Checchio Pessoa, Ingrid LU
supervisor
organization
course
HARN63 20211
year
type
H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
subject
keywords
Intellectual property, patents, scope of protection, doctrine of equivalence, comparative study
language
English
id
9056730
date added to LUP
2021-06-22 13:12:54
date last changed
2021-06-22 13:12:54
@misc{9056730,
  abstract     = {{In the field of patent law, the doctrine of equivalence extends the scope of a patent beyond its literal language to cover inconsequential variations of a patentable invention. This doctrine is arguably one of the most important aspects of patent law. The protection a patent confers is meaningless if its scope is determined to be so narrow that trivial changes to a device bring it out of the bounds of the patent. One of the greatest challenges courts and legislatures therefore face in patent law is to create rules for determining patent scope that maintain the protection a patent is meant to confer while still keeping the patent monopoly within reasonable bounds.
Despite the general unity in patent laws among developed countries, the difficulty of this task has led to different results in different jurisdictions. Many jurisdictions have chosen to determine patent scope under a doctrine of equivalence, while others have maintained the position that adequate scope can be found within the meaning of a patent's claim. Even jurisdictions which agree that a doctrine of equivalence should apply differ significantly in its application.
This thesis provides an examination of the doctrine of equivalence from the perspective of three different jurisdictions – The United States, Germany and the United Kingdom – and their separate answers to the question of patent scope.}},
  author       = {{Checchio Pessoa, Ingrid}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{The Doctrine of Equivalence in Patent Law - A Comparative Study in Different Jurisdictions}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}