Expertmakt bakom steriliseringskravet - Om rätten till juridiskt könsbyte för transpersoner och kraven som kom därtill
(2025) STVK04 20251Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This thesis examines how the sterilization requirement for transgender individuals who wanted to change their legal gender in Sweden between 1972 and 2013 was shaped in governmental invesigations (Statens offentliga utredningar) based on expert opinions and dominant descourses in society. The thesis has also investigated whether the sterilization requirement can be seen as a biopolitical practice. The analysis is based on three theoretical framework; Roger Jr. Pielke’s framework, which describes the role of experts in decicion making, Zeynep Pamuk’s theory regarding experts and values and Foucault’s discourse analysis focusing on biopolitics, to adress the research questions. Trough discourse analysis, the investigations (SOU 1968:28) and... (More)
- This thesis examines how the sterilization requirement for transgender individuals who wanted to change their legal gender in Sweden between 1972 and 2013 was shaped in governmental invesigations (Statens offentliga utredningar) based on expert opinions and dominant descourses in society. The thesis has also investigated whether the sterilization requirement can be seen as a biopolitical practice. The analysis is based on three theoretical framework; Roger Jr. Pielke’s framework, which describes the role of experts in decicion making, Zeynep Pamuk’s theory regarding experts and values and Foucault’s discourse analysis focusing on biopolitics, to adress the research questions. Trough discourse analysis, the investigations (SOU 1968:28) and (SOU 2007:16) have been analyzed based on how concepts such as gender, gender identity and transsexualism have been defined and influenced the decision on what requirements should be established to change legal gender. The results show that the experts largely assumed a role that provided politicians with crucial medical options for the requirements for legal gender change. The demands that arose can be seen as biopolitical power where the state regulated over people’s bodies. The investigation is significant for our understandning of how the rights of transgender individuals have been conditioned and how the state has historically controlled people’s bodies and reproduction rights (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9189551
- author
- Johnsson, Jessica LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- Expert Authority Behind the Sterilization Requirement - Regarding the right to legal gender transition for transgender individuals and the requirements that came with it
- course
- STVK04 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Statens offentliga utredningar, könstillhörighetslagen, expert, steriliseringskrav, könsidentitet, transsexuell, biopolitik, diskursteori
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9189551
- date added to LUP
- 2025-08-08 11:06:28
- date last changed
- 2025-08-08 11:06:28
@misc{9189551, abstract = {{This thesis examines how the sterilization requirement for transgender individuals who wanted to change their legal gender in Sweden between 1972 and 2013 was shaped in governmental invesigations (Statens offentliga utredningar) based on expert opinions and dominant descourses in society. The thesis has also investigated whether the sterilization requirement can be seen as a biopolitical practice. The analysis is based on three theoretical framework; Roger Jr. Pielke’s framework, which describes the role of experts in decicion making, Zeynep Pamuk’s theory regarding experts and values and Foucault’s discourse analysis focusing on biopolitics, to adress the research questions. Trough discourse analysis, the investigations (SOU 1968:28) and (SOU 2007:16) have been analyzed based on how concepts such as gender, gender identity and transsexualism have been defined and influenced the decision on what requirements should be established to change legal gender. The results show that the experts largely assumed a role that provided politicians with crucial medical options for the requirements for legal gender change. The demands that arose can be seen as biopolitical power where the state regulated over people’s bodies. The investigation is significant for our understandning of how the rights of transgender individuals have been conditioned and how the state has historically controlled people’s bodies and reproduction rights}}, author = {{Johnsson, Jessica}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Expertmakt bakom steriliseringskravet - Om rätten till juridiskt könsbyte för transpersoner och kraven som kom därtill}}, year = {{2025}}, }