Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

”Hur i helvete kan ni komma och kalla oss porrblad?”: Pornografiska inslag och abjekt kroppslighet i undergroundtidskriften PUSS

Sørensen, Lise LU (2026) KOVK03 20252
Division of Art History and Visual Studies
Abstract
The satirical underground magazine PUSS, published in twenty four regular numbers in the Swedish language between 1968 and 1973, used provocative images and texts to get its critique and commentary across. This included pornographically coded images depicting nude bodies and genitalia, which in the third issue came in the form of manipulated photographs of nude or semi-nude political leaders. These images, especially the one depicting party leader Sven Wedén (FP) holding his penis up with pliers, garnered a lot of attention from newspapers at the time, leading to the magazine to be labeled by many as pornographic. This study aims to examine this porn label by looking both at the reactions in the press and in PUSS itself, as well as the... (More)
The satirical underground magazine PUSS, published in twenty four regular numbers in the Swedish language between 1968 and 1973, used provocative images and texts to get its critique and commentary across. This included pornographically coded images depicting nude bodies and genitalia, which in the third issue came in the form of manipulated photographs of nude or semi-nude political leaders. These images, especially the one depicting party leader Sven Wedén (FP) holding his penis up with pliers, garnered a lot of attention from newspapers at the time, leading to the magazine to be labeled by many as pornographic. This study aims to examine this porn label by looking both at the reactions in the press and in PUSS itself, as well as the visual-verbal rhetoric of the magazine itself, on the basis of the following question: a) How can PUSS's third issue's pornographic label be understood through the reactions in daily newspapers and PUSS? b) How are bodies and physicality portrayed in the magazine? c) What functions do the pornographic and abject elements in the magazine serve?

This is done through reception history in the first part of the analysis, using a theoretical framework from Wolfgang Kemp and Stuart Hall, followed by a semiotic breakdown and comparison of two images from PUSS number 3 based on Roland Barthes Rhetoric of the Image. In the last part of the analysis, the discussion is widened to address the visual-verbal rhetoric of the magazine as a whole, based on three aspects: Criticism and ridicule, sex and gender, and pornography in the public sphere. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Sørensen, Lise LU
supervisor
organization
course
KOVK03 20252
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Underground, Porn Studies, Porrstudier, pornografivetenskap, 1968, 68-konst
language
Swedish
id
9223178
date added to LUP
2026-02-24 07:38:08
date last changed
2026-02-24 07:38:08
@misc{9223178,
  abstract     = {{The satirical underground magazine PUSS, published in twenty four regular numbers in the Swedish language between 1968 and 1973, used provocative images and texts to get its critique and commentary across. This included pornographically coded images depicting nude bodies and genitalia, which in the third issue came in the form of manipulated photographs of nude or semi-nude political leaders. These images, especially the one depicting party leader Sven Wedén (FP) holding his penis up with pliers, garnered a lot of attention from newspapers at the time, leading to the magazine to be labeled by many as pornographic. This study aims to examine this porn label by looking both at the reactions in the press and in PUSS itself, as well as the visual-verbal rhetoric of the magazine itself, on the basis of the following question: a) How can PUSS's third issue's pornographic label be understood through the reactions in daily newspapers and PUSS? b) How are bodies and physicality portrayed in the magazine? c) What functions do the pornographic and abject elements in the magazine serve?

This is done through reception history in the first part of the analysis, using a theoretical framework from Wolfgang Kemp and Stuart Hall, followed by a semiotic breakdown and comparison of two images from PUSS number 3 based on Roland Barthes Rhetoric of the Image. In the last part of the analysis, the discussion is widened to address the visual-verbal rhetoric of the magazine as a whole, based on three aspects: Criticism and ridicule, sex and gender, and pornography in the public sphere.}},
  author       = {{Sørensen, Lise}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{”Hur i helvete kan ni komma och kalla oss porrblad?”: Pornografiska inslag och abjekt kroppslighet i undergroundtidskriften PUSS}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}