CAP ? pengaslukande monster eller effektiv jordbrukspolitik EU:s gemensamma jordbrukspolitik sedd ur tre olika teoretiska perspektiv
(2006)Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- The Common Agricultural Policy has been a burning topic for debate for several
decades. According to the CAP:s opponents it's effects include pollution, market distortions
and not least a huge expense for the European union.
In this study we seek to explain why the CAP has remained almost
unreformed since it's constitution in the 1950:s. The means by which we do so is
a case study where we analyze the CAP by using three different theories; liberal
inter-governmentalism, realistic trade theory and new institutionalism.
In the final chapter we conclude that the theories complement each other. New
institutionalism explains the rigidity of the CAP. The liberal perspective explains
the origin and the logic behind the policy whereas the... (More) - The Common Agricultural Policy has been a burning topic for debate for several
decades. According to the CAP:s opponents it's effects include pollution, market distortions
and not least a huge expense for the European union.
In this study we seek to explain why the CAP has remained almost
unreformed since it's constitution in the 1950:s. The means by which we do so is
a case study where we analyze the CAP by using three different theories; liberal
inter-governmentalism, realistic trade theory and new institutionalism.
In the final chapter we conclude that the theories complement each other. New
institutionalism explains the rigidity of the CAP. The liberal perspective explains
the origin and the logic behind the policy whereas the realistic point of view puts
the policy in the light of an international economic theory and recognizes national
policy makers roll in the inflexibility of the CAP. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1325768
- author
- Arvidsson, Henrik ; Dahl, Staffan and Junesjö, Olof
- supervisor
- organization
- year
- 2006
- type
- L2 - 2nd term paper (old degree order)
- subject
- keywords
- CAP (Common Agriculture Policy), European Union, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, CAP (EU:s gemensamma jordbrukspolitik), EU, Social sciences, Samhällsvetenskaper
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 1325768
- date added to LUP
- 2006-06-19 00:00:00
- date last changed
- 2006-06-19 00:00:00
@misc{1325768,
abstract = {{The Common Agricultural Policy has been a burning topic for debate for several
decades. According to the CAP:s opponents it's effects include pollution, market distortions
and not least a huge expense for the European union.
In this study we seek to explain why the CAP has remained almost
unreformed since it's constitution in the 1950:s. The means by which we do so is
a case study where we analyze the CAP by using three different theories; liberal
inter-governmentalism, realistic trade theory and new institutionalism.
In the final chapter we conclude that the theories complement each other. New
institutionalism explains the rigidity of the CAP. The liberal perspective explains
the origin and the logic behind the policy whereas the realistic point of view puts
the policy in the light of an international economic theory and recognizes national
policy makers roll in the inflexibility of the CAP.}},
author = {{Arvidsson, Henrik and Dahl, Staffan and Junesjö, Olof}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{CAP ? pengaslukande monster eller effektiv jordbrukspolitik EU:s gemensamma jordbrukspolitik sedd ur tre olika teoretiska perspektiv}},
year = {{2006}},
}