Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Den tunna röda linjen : identitet inom arkeologisk teori och metod

Öwre, Carolina (2006)
Archaeology
Abstract
THE THIN RED LINE ? Identity in theory and method With this essay I want to explore some possibilities with the term identity within archaeology. Identity is a term best understood in the light of different scientific approaches. For instance the anthropological and historical angel combined with the quality of archaeology, as is the case in this essay. By combining these approaches, I create a (clarification) method of exploring traces of identity.

By analysing two different graves from Scania, having a negligible number of artefacts from the Viking Age, and three graves from Bornholm, known for its large number of finds from this period, I test the ability of my method. In short the result shows that it is the context of thing, body and... (More)
THE THIN RED LINE ? Identity in theory and method With this essay I want to explore some possibilities with the term identity within archaeology. Identity is a term best understood in the light of different scientific approaches. For instance the anthropological and historical angel combined with the quality of archaeology, as is the case in this essay. By combining these approaches, I create a (clarification) method of exploring traces of identity.

By analysing two different graves from Scania, having a negligible number of artefacts from the Viking Age, and three graves from Bornholm, known for its large number of finds from this period, I test the ability of my method. In short the result shows that it is the context of thing, body and construction on the grave that is significant for finding identity in prehistoric graves. I also want to focus on the social function of the objects found in graves. The social function, in this context, means that artefacts have an additional dimension of meaning other than the usual practical and symbolic function. It is built on an assumption that the presence of objects in a grave is a form of social understanding of an individual. It could also be a kind of projection of a social image that is based on the wishes of those who buried the person. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Öwre, Carolina
supervisor
organization
year
type
H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
subject
keywords
identity, context, symbols, social function, understanding., Archaeology, Arkeologi
language
Swedish
id
1328656
date added to LUP
2006-01-24 00:00:00
date last changed
2006-01-24 00:00:00
@misc{1328656,
  abstract     = {{THE THIN RED LINE ? Identity in theory and method With this essay I want to explore some possibilities with the term identity within archaeology. Identity is a term best understood in the light of different scientific approaches. For instance the anthropological and historical angel combined with the quality of archaeology, as is the case in this essay. By combining these approaches, I create a (clarification) method of exploring traces of identity.

By analysing two different graves from Scania, having a negligible number of artefacts from the Viking Age, and three graves from Bornholm, known for its large number of finds from this period, I test the ability of my method. In short the result shows that it is the context of thing, body and construction on the grave that is significant for finding identity in prehistoric graves. I also want to focus on the social function of the objects found in graves. The social function, in this context, means that artefacts have an additional dimension of meaning other than the usual practical and symbolic function. It is built on an assumption that the presence of objects in a grave is a form of social understanding of an individual. It could also be a kind of projection of a social image that is based on the wishes of those who buried the person.}},
  author       = {{Öwre, Carolina}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Den tunna röda linjen : identitet inom arkeologisk teori och metod}},
  year         = {{2006}},
}