Advanced

Tänker vi lika?- en undersökning gjord om hur socialtjänsten och förvaltningsrätten resonerar fram sina beslut i LVU-ärenden.

Samuelsson, Malin LU (2011) SOPA63 20102
School of Social Work
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine how the social service and the adminisarative law reasoning out their decisions in cases concerning compulsory care of children under LVU §2. The aim was also to concider how to discern any similarities or differences in the two organizations way of reasoning. An content analysis is made on social service´s childcare investigations and the judgements made by the administrative law in those cases. The prevalence and the use of the concepts children´s best, needs and risks is investigated and used as a tool to analyze how the two organizations argue out their decisions in cases involving LVU §2. The results shows that both organizations reasoning out their decisions in a similar way, exept in one of... (More)
The purpose of this paper is to examine how the social service and the adminisarative law reasoning out their decisions in cases concerning compulsory care of children under LVU §2. The aim was also to concider how to discern any similarities or differences in the two organizations way of reasoning. An content analysis is made on social service´s childcare investigations and the judgements made by the administrative law in those cases. The prevalence and the use of the concepts children´s best, needs and risks is investigated and used as a tool to analyze how the two organizations argue out their decisions in cases involving LVU §2. The results shows that both organizations reasoning out their decisions in a similar way, exept in one of the four cases in this study. This result can be understood by the institutional theory by menaing that social service and the adminsitrative law face each other in what in this paper is callet a terapeutic law.

Keywords: children´s best, needs, risk, institutional logic, reasoning (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Samuelsson, Malin LU
supervisor
organization
course
SOPA63 20102
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
children´s best, needs, risk, institutional logic, reasoning
language
Swedish
id
1857587
date added to LUP
2011-03-24 13:35:13
date last changed
2011-03-24 13:35:13
@misc{1857587,
  abstract     = {The purpose of this paper is to examine how the social service and the adminisarative law reasoning out their decisions in cases concerning compulsory care of children under LVU §2. The aim was also to concider how to discern any similarities or differences in the two organizations way of reasoning. An content analysis is made on social service´s childcare investigations and the judgements made by the administrative law in those cases. The prevalence and the use of the concepts children´s best, needs and risks is investigated and used as a tool to analyze how the two organizations argue out their decisions in cases involving LVU §2. The results shows that both organizations reasoning out their decisions in a similar way, exept in one of the four cases in this study. This result can be understood by the institutional theory by menaing that social service and the adminsitrative law face each other in what in this paper is callet a terapeutic law. 

Keywords: children´s best, needs, risk, institutional logic, reasoning},
  author       = {Samuelsson, Malin},
  keyword      = {children´s best,needs,risk,institutional logic,reasoning},
  language     = {swe},
  note         = {Student Paper},
  title        = {Tänker vi lika?- en undersökning gjord om hur socialtjänsten och förvaltningsrätten resonerar fram sina beslut i LVU-ärenden.},
  year         = {2011},
}