Signalspaningsspektaklet
(2015) STVK02 20151Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- How are securitizing moves accepted or rejected? This report analyses the security discourse in the case of the polarizing debate held between 2007-2013 in the Swedish Riksdag over a change in the legislative framework regarding Swedish National Defence Radio Establishments right to collect information from cable communication. In doing so the aim is to further the discussion and understanding of what factors generally are needed to securitize an issue. The report argues that whilst a securitization move was successful in framing the threat validating the law, theoretically securitizing the issue, the outcome put the issue into a partly securitized area. The main cause of this outcome was found to be that the securitizing actor lacked... (More)
- How are securitizing moves accepted or rejected? This report analyses the security discourse in the case of the polarizing debate held between 2007-2013 in the Swedish Riksdag over a change in the legislative framework regarding Swedish National Defence Radio Establishments right to collect information from cable communication. In doing so the aim is to further the discussion and understanding of what factors generally are needed to securitize an issue. The report argues that whilst a securitization move was successful in framing the threat validating the law, theoretically securitizing the issue, the outcome put the issue into a partly securitized area. The main cause of this outcome was found to be that the securitizing actor lacked internal consensus regarding the issue weakening its stands.
Furthermore emphasis is given to the so-called relevant audience as well as other contextual aspects using John Kingdon's “Three Streams” Theory and Framing Theory. It hypothesizes that a partly successful securitization may open a policy window in which the audience simultaneously can act as policy actors. In the case this hypothesis was accepted however, the correlation between partly securitized issues and policy windows needs further studying. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/5425306
- author
- Einarsson, Antonia LU
- supervisor
-
- Erik Ringmar LU
- organization
- alternative title
- Riksdagens strid om hotbilden i signalspaningsdebatten
- course
- STVK02 20151
- year
- 2015
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Securitization Theory, Signalspaningslagen, Politicalization, Framing Theory, Policy Window, FRA
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 5425306
- date added to LUP
- 2015-07-13 12:10:48
- date last changed
- 2015-07-13 12:10:48
@misc{5425306, abstract = {{How are securitizing moves accepted or rejected? This report analyses the security discourse in the case of the polarizing debate held between 2007-2013 in the Swedish Riksdag over a change in the legislative framework regarding Swedish National Defence Radio Establishments right to collect information from cable communication. In doing so the aim is to further the discussion and understanding of what factors generally are needed to securitize an issue. The report argues that whilst a securitization move was successful in framing the threat validating the law, theoretically securitizing the issue, the outcome put the issue into a partly securitized area. The main cause of this outcome was found to be that the securitizing actor lacked internal consensus regarding the issue weakening its stands. Furthermore emphasis is given to the so-called relevant audience as well as other contextual aspects using John Kingdon's “Three Streams” Theory and Framing Theory. It hypothesizes that a partly successful securitization may open a policy window in which the audience simultaneously can act as policy actors. In the case this hypothesis was accepted however, the correlation between partly securitized issues and policy windows needs further studying.}}, author = {{Einarsson, Antonia}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Signalspaningsspektaklet}}, year = {{2015}}, }