Bortom Sveriges gränser, inom krigets ramar - En analys av svenska partiers rättfärdigande av ett förbud för svenskar som krigar utomlands
(2015) STVK02 20151Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This thesis aims to investigate how the parties represented in the Swedish parliament justify the ban for Swedish citizens to wage war for any army except the Swedish. The analyzed material has been collected through personal interviews with each party’s legislative spokesmen. The method used to analyze the material is an analysis of ideas inspired by Torbjörn Aronson’s morphological content analysis, and the thesis consequently adds to the extensive body of research concerning political ideas. Ideal types are extracted from realism, liberalism, and post-structuralism. These ideal types are then used in order to identify the hierarchy of values within the argumentation given by each party representative. Significant results include that... (More)
- This thesis aims to investigate how the parties represented in the Swedish parliament justify the ban for Swedish citizens to wage war for any army except the Swedish. The analyzed material has been collected through personal interviews with each party’s legislative spokesmen. The method used to analyze the material is an analysis of ideas inspired by Torbjörn Aronson’s morphological content analysis, and the thesis consequently adds to the extensive body of research concerning political ideas. Ideal types are extracted from realism, liberalism, and post-structuralism. These ideal types are then used in order to identify the hierarchy of values within the argumentation given by each party representative. Significant results include that all the parties, with the exemption of the Green Party and the Left Party, justified the legislative restraints referring to the security of the State. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/5426094
- author
- Blixt, Anna LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVK02 20151
- year
- 2015
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Political justification, anti-terror legislation, content analysis
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 5426094
- date added to LUP
- 2015-07-13 12:10:05
- date last changed
- 2015-07-13 12:10:05
@misc{5426094, abstract = {{This thesis aims to investigate how the parties represented in the Swedish parliament justify the ban for Swedish citizens to wage war for any army except the Swedish. The analyzed material has been collected through personal interviews with each party’s legislative spokesmen. The method used to analyze the material is an analysis of ideas inspired by Torbjörn Aronson’s morphological content analysis, and the thesis consequently adds to the extensive body of research concerning political ideas. Ideal types are extracted from realism, liberalism, and post-structuralism. These ideal types are then used in order to identify the hierarchy of values within the argumentation given by each party representative. Significant results include that all the parties, with the exemption of the Green Party and the Left Party, justified the legislative restraints referring to the security of the State.}}, author = {{Blixt, Anna}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Bortom Sveriges gränser, inom krigets ramar - En analys av svenska partiers rättfärdigande av ett förbud för svenskar som krigar utomlands}}, year = {{2015}}, }