Den odemokratiska lobbyingen? - En utvärderande idealtypsanalys om regleringen av lobbying och karantäntid
(2016) STVK02 20161Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- Sweden has no legislated regulation for lobbying, but there is a huge on going discussion about the benefits and disadvantages with lobbying related to democratic values. This essay is studying parliamentary bills from 2000-2015, which has been raised in the question and the essay is embracing a democratic view where Robert Dahl’s theory about democracy is used as a foundation to the ideal types openness and political equality. The parliamentary bills are suggesting regulations as a registration of lobbyists, a code of conduct, an education and a quarantine-time.
The aim with the essay is to investigate what a regulation of lobbying and the insertion of quarantine have for impact on openness and political equality. The result is that the... (More) - Sweden has no legislated regulation for lobbying, but there is a huge on going discussion about the benefits and disadvantages with lobbying related to democratic values. This essay is studying parliamentary bills from 2000-2015, which has been raised in the question and the essay is embracing a democratic view where Robert Dahl’s theory about democracy is used as a foundation to the ideal types openness and political equality. The parliamentary bills are suggesting regulations as a registration of lobbyists, a code of conduct, an education and a quarantine-time.
The aim with the essay is to investigate what a regulation of lobbying and the insertion of quarantine have for impact on openness and political equality. The result is that the parliamentary bills are taking openness in consideration a lot more than the political equality. Most suggestions are based on that lobbying have to be more open but the problem with inequality is not handled in the same extent. A several suggestions are even decreasing the political equality. Since the parliamentary bills do not handle the democratic ideal types to the extent that is necessary, it can lead to a democratic deficit in the debate of regulation. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8873419
- author
- Röjd, Lovisa LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVK02 20161
- year
- 2016
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 8873419
- date added to LUP
- 2016-06-17 11:47:09
- date last changed
- 2016-06-17 11:47:09
@misc{8873419,
abstract = {{Sweden has no legislated regulation for lobbying, but there is a huge on going discussion about the benefits and disadvantages with lobbying related to democratic values. This essay is studying parliamentary bills from 2000-2015, which has been raised in the question and the essay is embracing a democratic view where Robert Dahl’s theory about democracy is used as a foundation to the ideal types openness and political equality. The parliamentary bills are suggesting regulations as a registration of lobbyists, a code of conduct, an education and a quarantine-time.
The aim with the essay is to investigate what a regulation of lobbying and the insertion of quarantine have for impact on openness and political equality. The result is that the parliamentary bills are taking openness in consideration a lot more than the political equality. Most suggestions are based on that lobbying have to be more open but the problem with inequality is not handled in the same extent. A several suggestions are even decreasing the political equality. Since the parliamentary bills do not handle the democratic ideal types to the extent that is necessary, it can lead to a democratic deficit in the debate of regulation.}},
author = {{Röjd, Lovisa}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Den odemokratiska lobbyingen? - En utvärderande idealtypsanalys om regleringen av lobbying och karantäntid}},
year = {{2016}},
}