Advanced

Om användaren själv får välja : svenska akademiska biblioteks dokumenterade uppfattningar om förvärv

Köpsén, Lina LU (2016) ABMM54 20161
Division of ALM
Department of Arts and Cultural Sciences
Abstract
Making decisions on what to acquire and what not to acquire is, and has been for centuries, a task that librarians are relied on to perform. Over the recent decades focus in acquisitions has turned slightly away from the expertise of the librarians towards the needs of the library users. Reasons for the turn has been lacking financial funds and a desire to increase service in libraries. The effect of this turn has resulted in that library users are encouraged to, and sometimes even expected to, contribute to the collection development by communicating their literature needs to the librarians. To manage collection development and to set a standard for the library, acquisition policies are often produced.

The aim of this study is to... (More)
Making decisions on what to acquire and what not to acquire is, and has been for centuries, a task that librarians are relied on to perform. Over the recent decades focus in acquisitions has turned slightly away from the expertise of the librarians towards the needs of the library users. Reasons for the turn has been lacking financial funds and a desire to increase service in libraries. The effect of this turn has resulted in that library users are encouraged to, and sometimes even expected to, contribute to the collection development by communicating their literature needs to the librarians. To manage collection development and to set a standard for the library, acquisition policies are often produced.

The aim of this study is to increase the understanding of how Swedish academic libraries value their users’ influence on acquiring information resources through different manners of user-driven acquisition models. In accomplishing the aim 31 collection development policies have been collected from Swedish academic libraries. The policies have undergone an analysis called What’s the problem represented to be?. The method was created by Carol Bacchi, whom has been greatly inspired by Michel Foucault’s discourse analysis in her creation, and theoretical questions of power and representation permeate it.

Results from this analysis point to user influence on acquisitions as something valuable to the libraries. Often times some users are more valuable than others though. In most policies the user-driven acquisitions rely on library users to make purchase recommendations at the library or on the library homepage. One of the main reasons for wanting users to contribute to the collection development is that literature acquired on demand of users are borrowed to a greater extent. In evaluations literature that is used more comes out as the more economic choice which is what the librarians are aiming for. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Köpsén, Lina LU
supervisor
organization
alternative title
Who is the user to decide : Conceptions of acquisitions in Swedish academic library policies
course
ABMM54 20161
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
akademiska bibliotek, Bacchi, WPR, McDonaldization, user centered, user needs, collection development, library policy, academic libraries, information studies, critical policy analysis, policyanalys, beståndsutveckling, användarstyrning, förvärvspolicy, biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap, library and information studies
language
Swedish
id
8874821
date added to LUP
2016-06-09 15:17:52
date last changed
2016-06-09 15:17:52
@misc{8874821,
  abstract     = {Making decisions on what to acquire and what not to acquire is, and has been for centuries, a task that librarians are relied on to perform. Over the recent decades focus in acquisitions has turned slightly away from the expertise of the librarians towards the needs of the library users. Reasons for the turn has been lacking financial funds and a desire to increase service in libraries. The effect of this turn has resulted in that library users are encouraged to, and sometimes even expected to, contribute to the collection development by communicating their literature needs to the librarians. To manage collection development and to set a standard for the library, acquisition policies are often produced.

The aim of this study is to increase the understanding of how Swedish academic libraries value their users’ influence on acquiring information resources through different manners of user-driven acquisition models. In accomplishing the aim 31 collection development policies have been collected from Swedish academic libraries. The policies have undergone an analysis called What’s the problem represented to be?. The method was created by Carol Bacchi, whom has been greatly inspired by Michel Foucault’s discourse analysis in her creation, and theoretical questions of power and representation permeate it.

Results from this analysis point to user influence on acquisitions as something valuable to the libraries. Often times some users are more valuable than others though. In most policies the user-driven acquisitions rely on library users to make purchase recommendations at the library or on the library homepage. One of the main reasons for wanting users to contribute to the collection development is that literature acquired on demand of users are borrowed to a greater extent. In evaluations literature that is used more comes out as the more economic choice which is what the librarians are aiming for.},
  author       = {Köpsén, Lina},
  keyword      = {akademiska bibliotek,Bacchi,WPR,McDonaldization,user centered,user needs,collection development,library policy,academic libraries,information studies,critical policy analysis,policyanalys,beståndsutveckling,användarstyrning,förvärvspolicy,biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap,library and information studies},
  language     = {swe},
  note         = {Student Paper},
  title        = {Om användaren själv får välja : svenska akademiska biblioteks dokumenterade uppfattningar om förvärv},
  year         = {2016},
}