Socialsekreterares professionella förhållningssätt : En kvalitativ studie om socialsekreterares resonemang vid beslutsfattandet
(2018) SOPA63 20172School of Social Work
- Abstract
- The aim with this thesis was to study how social workers who work with financial assistance deliberate in their decision making. We wanted to see how these social workers discussed different cases with each other and then see if there’s a difference in the discussion and the decision making depending on what city the social worker works in. We have used a qualitative method to be able to find an answer to our questions. The method we used was focus groups interviews. We had three interviews in three different cities. Each focus group consisted of two to three social workers who discussed four made up cases and then took a decision if the people in the cases have the legal right to get financial help or not. We have used two theories to... (More)
- The aim with this thesis was to study how social workers who work with financial assistance deliberate in their decision making. We wanted to see how these social workers discussed different cases with each other and then see if there’s a difference in the discussion and the decision making depending on what city the social worker works in. We have used a qualitative method to be able to find an answer to our questions. The method we used was focus groups interviews. We had three interviews in three different cities. Each focus group consisted of two to three social workers who discussed four made up cases and then took a decision if the people in the cases have the legal right to get financial help or not. We have used two theories to analyse our data, accounts and legitimacy, to help us understand how the social workers used the language. The result we got was that there are differences in the social workers’ discussions. We could especially see differences between the different cities, but there were also some differences in the discussions within the same cities. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8932631
- author
- Brozinic, Louise LU and González Musso Sánchez, Alba LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- SOPA63 20172
- year
- 2018
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- financial assistance, organizations, professional role, values, professionalism
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 8932631
- date added to LUP
- 2018-01-25 13:09:22
- date last changed
- 2018-01-25 13:09:22
@misc{8932631, abstract = {{The aim with this thesis was to study how social workers who work with financial assistance deliberate in their decision making. We wanted to see how these social workers discussed different cases with each other and then see if there’s a difference in the discussion and the decision making depending on what city the social worker works in. We have used a qualitative method to be able to find an answer to our questions. The method we used was focus groups interviews. We had three interviews in three different cities. Each focus group consisted of two to three social workers who discussed four made up cases and then took a decision if the people in the cases have the legal right to get financial help or not. We have used two theories to analyse our data, accounts and legitimacy, to help us understand how the social workers used the language. The result we got was that there are differences in the social workers’ discussions. We could especially see differences between the different cities, but there were also some differences in the discussions within the same cities.}}, author = {{Brozinic, Louise and González Musso Sánchez, Alba}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Socialsekreterares professionella förhållningssätt : En kvalitativ studie om socialsekreterares resonemang vid beslutsfattandet}}, year = {{2018}}, }