Advanced

Socialsekreterares professionella förhållningssätt : En kvalitativ studie om socialsekreterares resonemang vid beslutsfattandet

Brozinic, Louise LU and González Musso Sánchez, Alba LU (2018) SOPA63 20172
School of Social Work
Abstract
The aim with this thesis was to study how social workers who work with financial assistance deliberate in their decision making. We wanted to see how these social workers discussed different cases with each other and then see if there’s a difference in the discussion and the decision making depending on what city the social worker works in. We have used a qualitative method to be able to find an answer to our questions. The method we used was focus groups interviews. We had three interviews in three different cities. Each focus group consisted of two to three social workers who discussed four made up cases and then took a decision if the people in the cases have the legal right to get financial help or not. We have used two theories to... (More)
The aim with this thesis was to study how social workers who work with financial assistance deliberate in their decision making. We wanted to see how these social workers discussed different cases with each other and then see if there’s a difference in the discussion and the decision making depending on what city the social worker works in. We have used a qualitative method to be able to find an answer to our questions. The method we used was focus groups interviews. We had three interviews in three different cities. Each focus group consisted of two to three social workers who discussed four made up cases and then took a decision if the people in the cases have the legal right to get financial help or not. We have used two theories to analyse our data, accounts and legitimacy, to help us understand how the social workers used the language. The result we got was that there are differences in the social workers’ discussions. We could especially see differences between the different cities, but there were also some differences in the discussions within the same cities. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Brozinic, Louise LU and González Musso Sánchez, Alba LU
supervisor
organization
course
SOPA63 20172
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
financial assistance, organizations, professional role, values, professionalism
language
Swedish
id
8932631
date added to LUP
2018-01-25 13:09:22
date last changed
2018-01-25 13:09:22
@misc{8932631,
  abstract     = {The aim with this thesis was to study how social workers who work with financial assistance deliberate in their decision making. We wanted to see how these social workers discussed different cases with each other and then see if there’s a difference in the discussion and the decision making depending on what city the social worker works in. We have used a qualitative method to be able to find an answer to our questions. The method we used was focus groups interviews. We had three interviews in three different cities. Each focus group consisted of two to three social workers who discussed four made up cases and then took a decision if the people in the cases have the legal right to get financial help or not. We have used two theories to analyse our data, accounts and legitimacy, to help us understand how the social workers used the language. The result we got was that there are differences in the social workers’ discussions. We could especially see differences between the different cities, but there were also some differences in the discussions within the same cities.},
  author       = {Brozinic, Louise and González Musso Sánchez, Alba},
  keyword      = {financial assistance,organizations,professional role,values,professionalism},
  language     = {swe},
  note         = {Student Paper},
  title        = {Socialsekreterares professionella förhållningssätt : En kvalitativ studie om socialsekreterares resonemang vid beslutsfattandet},
  year         = {2018},
}