Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Mind the Gap: A characterisation of UK corporate sustainability through reporting by FTSE 100 listed companies

Newton, Joshua LU (2018) In IIIEE Master Thesis IMEN41 20181
The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics
Abstract
As a de facto leader in corporate governance and sustainability reporting (SR), this study provides a thorough and comprehensive characterisation of SR among the UK’s leading companies. A content analysis was undertaken of key corporate communications across a sample of 66 constituents listed on the London/ Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 index. Through a systematic analytical framework made up of sustainability/ corporate responsibility (S/CR) indicators, and additional performance variables, the ‘20/20+’ model allocated up to 40 points to each company. This approach represented a distinctive scoring model to benchmark company SR quality by illustrating a gap between what companies say they will do on sustainability issues... (More)
As a de facto leader in corporate governance and sustainability reporting (SR), this study provides a thorough and comprehensive characterisation of SR among the UK’s leading companies. A content analysis was undertaken of key corporate communications across a sample of 66 constituents listed on the London/ Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 index. Through a systematic analytical framework made up of sustainability/ corporate responsibility (S/CR) indicators, and additional performance variables, the ‘20/20+’ model allocated up to 40 points to each company. This approach represented a distinctive scoring model to benchmark company SR quality by illustrating a gap between what companies say they will do on sustainability issues (talk) and what they have actually done (walk). The S/CR indicators helped reflect the focus of current disclosures, the diffusion of best practices recognised in SR literature, give insight into how integrated sustainability activities appear to be to core company operations and show how aligned activities appear to be with societal goals as defined by the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The research finds on aggregate, a clear negative gap between ‘talk’ and ‘walk’, with only handful of companies appearing to ‘walk the talk’. In addition to minding the gap, the study also revealed a significant variation in sustainability practices overall. Common themes characterising UK SR were also identified. These include the underutilisation of disclosure enhancing tools, the fragmentation and omission of relevant information as well as a tendency to be more descriptive than measurable. The findings have implications for UK policy-makers, business organisations and researchers; the current reliance on voluntary disclosures and third-parties is failing to diffuse best practices, which not only improve sustainability but offer strategic benefits to companies. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Newton, Joshua LU
supervisor
organization
course
IMEN41 20181
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Sustainability reporting, corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, UK, FTSE 100, scoring model, content analysis
publication/series
IIIEE Master Thesis
report number
2018:26
ISSN
1401-9191
language
English
id
8963301
date added to LUP
2018-11-20 08:54:36
date last changed
2018-11-20 08:54:36
@misc{8963301,
  abstract     = {{As a de facto leader in corporate governance and sustainability reporting (SR), this study provides a thorough and comprehensive characterisation of SR among the UK’s leading companies. A content analysis was undertaken of key corporate communications across a sample of 66 constituents listed on the London/ Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 index. Through a systematic analytical framework made up of sustainability/ corporate responsibility (S/CR) indicators, and additional performance variables, the ‘20/20+’ model allocated up to 40 points to each company. This approach represented a distinctive scoring model to benchmark company SR quality by illustrating a gap between what companies say they will do on sustainability issues (talk) and what they have actually done (walk). The S/CR indicators helped reflect the focus of current disclosures, the diffusion of best practices recognised in SR literature, give insight into how integrated sustainability activities appear to be to core company operations and show how aligned activities appear to be with societal goals as defined by the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The research finds on aggregate, a clear negative gap between ‘talk’ and ‘walk’, with only handful of companies appearing to ‘walk the talk’. In addition to minding the gap, the study also revealed a significant variation in sustainability practices overall. Common themes characterising UK SR were also identified. These include the underutilisation of disclosure enhancing tools, the fragmentation and omission of relevant information as well as a tendency to be more descriptive than measurable. The findings have implications for UK policy-makers, business organisations and researchers; the current reliance on voluntary disclosures and third-parties is failing to diffuse best practices, which not only improve sustainability but offer strategic benefits to companies.}},
  author       = {{Newton, Joshua}},
  issn         = {{1401-9191}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  series       = {{IIIEE Master Thesis}},
  title        = {{Mind the Gap: A characterisation of UK corporate sustainability through reporting by FTSE 100 listed companies}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}