Samspel mellan arkitekter och konstruktörer under projekteringen
(2019) In TVBP VMTL01 20192Division of Building Services
Division of Building Physics
Department of Building and Environmental Technology
Department of Construction Sciences
- Abstract (Swedish)
- När byggproduktionen startas på ofullständiga handlingar, leder det alltid till många
kostsamma lösningar. Kostnaden att åtgärda fel är procentuellt mindre i
projekteringsfasen än i förvaltningsfasen när byggnaden står klar. Faktorer som är
bidragande till de stora kostnaderna i byggprocessen, är bland annat brister i projektering,
informationsöverföring och kommunikation. Samverkan och kommunikation är viktiga
faktorer för att kunna skapa en förtroendefull relation mellan deltagarna. Lagandan och
dynamiken i ett team är viktigt för att nå gemensamma mål. Arkitekter och konstruktörer
bör därför finna former för en fortlöpande dialog och visa varandra förtroende och
öppenhet.
Syftet med studien är att identifiera, analysera och... (More) - När byggproduktionen startas på ofullständiga handlingar, leder det alltid till många
kostsamma lösningar. Kostnaden att åtgärda fel är procentuellt mindre i
projekteringsfasen än i förvaltningsfasen när byggnaden står klar. Faktorer som är
bidragande till de stora kostnaderna i byggprocessen, är bland annat brister i projektering,
informationsöverföring och kommunikation. Samverkan och kommunikation är viktiga
faktorer för att kunna skapa en förtroendefull relation mellan deltagarna. Lagandan och
dynamiken i ett team är viktigt för att nå gemensamma mål. Arkitekter och konstruktörer
bör därför finna former för en fortlöpande dialog och visa varandra förtroende och
öppenhet.
Syftet med studien är att identifiera, analysera och effektivisera samspelet mellan
arkitekter och konstruktörer under projekteringsprocessen, ur ett tvärvetenskapligt
perspektiv. Genom intervjuer har undersökningen kunnat styrkas och visas i ett skarpt
läge de underliggande orsakerna till de brister som uppstår. Utifrån detta har förslag på
förbättringar tagits fram, som kan gynna ett företag ekonomiskt och på längre sikt.
Uppkomsten av dessa problem beror på att alla aktörer som samverkar, har inte samma
bakgrund och delar inte samma företagskultur. En oerfaren beställare som är otydlig och
benägen att göra ändringar men vill bygga på kortast möjlig tid, så billigt som möjligt
samtidigt som resultatet blir så bra som möjligt krävs att projektet leds med goda
samordningsfärdigheter och kommunikationsförmåga. Samarbetsfärdigheter och rätt
inställning i rollen som projektör kan lösa många missförstånd. Med rätt förutsättningar
kan förbättringsförslag appliceras och få genomslag.
Det finns en del förbättringsförslag som är lätta att genomföra, medan andra kräver mer
tid, energi och en större investering. Om fler får vara delaktiga och visar engagemang i
projektet kan det leda till ett bättre samarbete mellan aktörerna i byggprocessen. (Less) - Abstract (Swedish)
- Contractors who start building based on incomplete documents will always require many
costly solutions. The cost to correct mistakes in the beginning of the project is less than
the cost to correct mistakes at the end of the project when the admission takes over.
Factors that contribute to these large costs are in the planning stage, when transferring
information and lack of communication. Collaboration and communication are important
factors in creating a trusting relationship between the participants. The team spirit and the
dynamic of a team are important in achieving common goals. Architects and structural
engineers should therefore have a dialogue continuously and show each other trust and
openness.
The purpose of this study... (More) - Contractors who start building based on incomplete documents will always require many
costly solutions. The cost to correct mistakes in the beginning of the project is less than
the cost to correct mistakes at the end of the project when the admission takes over.
Factors that contribute to these large costs are in the planning stage, when transferring
information and lack of communication. Collaboration and communication are important
factors in creating a trusting relationship between the participants. The team spirit and the
dynamic of a team are important in achieving common goals. Architects and structural
engineers should therefore have a dialogue continuously and show each other trust and
openness.
The purpose of this study is to identify, analyze and an attempt to make the interaction
more efficient between architects and structural engineers during the planning process,
from a interdisciplinary perspective. The investigation of this study has been able to
establish the underlying causes of the problems through interviews. Based on this,
suggestions for improvements have been made, which can profit any company financially
in the long term.
The cause of these problems is due to the fact that all members of the team have different
backgrounds and different corporate culture. With an inexperienced client who is unclear
and prone to make changes and at the same time wants to build in the shortest possible
time, as cheaply as possible while the result is as good as possible, requires that the project
is managed with good coordination skills and communication skills. Many problems and
misunderstandings can be eliminated when the planner is entering a project with
collaboration skills and with the right attitude. With the right conditions, improvement
suggestions can be applicable and get a breakthrough.
Some improvement suggestions are easy to implement, while others require more time,
energy and a greater investment. If more people get involved and show commitment to
the project, the better the cooperation will be between architects and structural engineers
in the planning phase of the building process. (Less) - Popular Abstract
- Contractors who start building based on incomplete documents will always require many
costly solutions. The cost to correct mistakes in the beginning of the project is less than
the cost to correct mistakes at the end of the project when the admission takes over.
Factors that contribute to these large costs are in the planning stage, when transferring
information and lack of communication. Collaboration and communication are important
factors in creating a trusting relationship between the participants. The team spirit and the
dynamic of a team are important in achieving common goals. Architects and structural
engineers should therefore have a dialogue continuously and show each other trust and
openness.
The purpose of this study... (More) - Contractors who start building based on incomplete documents will always require many
costly solutions. The cost to correct mistakes in the beginning of the project is less than
the cost to correct mistakes at the end of the project when the admission takes over.
Factors that contribute to these large costs are in the planning stage, when transferring
information and lack of communication. Collaboration and communication are important
factors in creating a trusting relationship between the participants. The team spirit and the
dynamic of a team are important in achieving common goals. Architects and structural
engineers should therefore have a dialogue continuously and show each other trust and
openness.
The purpose of this study is to identify, analyze and an attempt to make the interaction
more efficient between architects and structural engineers during the planning process,
from a interdisciplinary perspective. The investigation of this study has been able to
establish the underlying causes of the problems through interviews. Based on this,
suggestions for improvements have been made, which can profit any company financially
in the long term.
The cause of these problems is due to the fact that all members of the team have different
backgrounds and different corporate culture. With an inexperienced client who is unclear
and prone to make changes and at the same time wants to build in the shortest possible
time, as cheaply as possible while the result is as good as possible, requires that the project
is managed with good coordination skills and communication skills. Many problems and
misunderstandings can be eliminated when the planner is entering a project with
collaboration skills and with the right attitude. With the right conditions, improvement
suggestions can be applicable and get a breakthrough.
Some improvement suggestions are easy to implement, while others require more time,
energy and a greater investment. If more people get involved and show commitment to
the project, the better the cooperation will be between architects and structural engineers
in the planning phase of the building process. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9001912
- author
- al Abdllawi, Sam LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- Coordination between architects and engineers during design
- course
- VMTL01 20192
- year
- 2019
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Samspel, samverkan, kommunikation, arkitekt, konstruktör, projektledare, projektering, projekteringsprocess, teamdynamik, partnering, erfarenhetsåterföring, engagemang. Interaction, collaboration, communication, architect, structural engineer, project manager, projection, projection process, team dynamics, feedback system, commitment.
- publication/series
- TVBP
- report number
- 19/5597
- language
- Swedish
- additional info
- Handledare: Radhlinah Aulin
Examinator: Urban Persson
HBG - id
- 9001912
- date added to LUP
- 2020-01-28 13:38:21
- date last changed
- 2020-01-28 13:38:21
@misc{9001912, abstract = {{Contractors who start building based on incomplete documents will always require many costly solutions. The cost to correct mistakes in the beginning of the project is less than the cost to correct mistakes at the end of the project when the admission takes over. Factors that contribute to these large costs are in the planning stage, when transferring information and lack of communication. Collaboration and communication are important factors in creating a trusting relationship between the participants. The team spirit and the dynamic of a team are important in achieving common goals. Architects and structural engineers should therefore have a dialogue continuously and show each other trust and openness. The purpose of this study is to identify, analyze and an attempt to make the interaction more efficient between architects and structural engineers during the planning process, from a interdisciplinary perspective. The investigation of this study has been able to establish the underlying causes of the problems through interviews. Based on this, suggestions for improvements have been made, which can profit any company financially in the long term. The cause of these problems is due to the fact that all members of the team have different backgrounds and different corporate culture. With an inexperienced client who is unclear and prone to make changes and at the same time wants to build in the shortest possible time, as cheaply as possible while the result is as good as possible, requires that the project is managed with good coordination skills and communication skills. Many problems and misunderstandings can be eliminated when the planner is entering a project with collaboration skills and with the right attitude. With the right conditions, improvement suggestions can be applicable and get a breakthrough. Some improvement suggestions are easy to implement, while others require more time, energy and a greater investment. If more people get involved and show commitment to the project, the better the cooperation will be between architects and structural engineers in the planning phase of the building process.}}, author = {{al Abdllawi, Sam}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, series = {{TVBP}}, title = {{Samspel mellan arkitekter och konstruktörer under projekteringen}}, year = {{2019}}, }