EU's Securitized Aid: a case study of the EU's counterterrorism regulations' effects on aid delivery in Palestine
(2020) SIMV07 20201Department of Political Science
Education
Master of Science in Global Studies
Graduate School
- Abstract
- Following 9/11, an explosion of transnational counterterrorism regulations aimed at countering the financing of terrorism has been established. These have since had suffocating effects on aid delivery in areas where designated terrorist organizations are present, resulting in the denying of aid to the most vulnerable. Regardless, transnational regulations have only grown more assertive during the last few years with an intensification of implications as well. The need for a normative assessment of these regulations and the negative effects they cause is ever growing and is, therefore, at the center of this research. In doing so, this research makes use of theories of securitization to understand the development of the EU’s core regulations... (More)
- Following 9/11, an explosion of transnational counterterrorism regulations aimed at countering the financing of terrorism has been established. These have since had suffocating effects on aid delivery in areas where designated terrorist organizations are present, resulting in the denying of aid to the most vulnerable. Regardless, transnational regulations have only grown more assertive during the last few years with an intensification of implications as well. The need for a normative assessment of these regulations and the negative effects they cause is ever growing and is, therefore, at the center of this research. In doing so, this research makes use of theories of securitization to understand the development of the EU’s core regulations on combating terrorism financing through a minor document analysis. The case study of Palestine is thereafter used to explore what implications aid delivery actors experience because of the EU regulations, drawing primarily on data collected through interviews with Palestinian NGOs. By developing theories on normative assessments of securitization processes, this study finally assesses the morality of the securitization and the following regulations. Findings show that the EU regulations are morally unjust and that they have resulted in a bolstering of Palestine’s aid-dependency by undermining Palestinian aid development and by allowing an exploitation of the regulations. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9026948
- author
- Rydell, Moa LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- SIMV07 20201
- year
- 2020
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- Just Securitization Theory, counterterrorism regulations, aid delivery, Palestine, anti-terrorism clause
- language
- English
- id
- 9026948
- date added to LUP
- 2020-09-01 11:03:11
- date last changed
- 2020-09-01 11:03:11
@misc{9026948, abstract = {{Following 9/11, an explosion of transnational counterterrorism regulations aimed at countering the financing of terrorism has been established. These have since had suffocating effects on aid delivery in areas where designated terrorist organizations are present, resulting in the denying of aid to the most vulnerable. Regardless, transnational regulations have only grown more assertive during the last few years with an intensification of implications as well. The need for a normative assessment of these regulations and the negative effects they cause is ever growing and is, therefore, at the center of this research. In doing so, this research makes use of theories of securitization to understand the development of the EU’s core regulations on combating terrorism financing through a minor document analysis. The case study of Palestine is thereafter used to explore what implications aid delivery actors experience because of the EU regulations, drawing primarily on data collected through interviews with Palestinian NGOs. By developing theories on normative assessments of securitization processes, this study finally assesses the morality of the securitization and the following regulations. Findings show that the EU regulations are morally unjust and that they have resulted in a bolstering of Palestine’s aid-dependency by undermining Palestinian aid development and by allowing an exploitation of the regulations.}}, author = {{Rydell, Moa}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{EU's Securitized Aid: a case study of the EU's counterterrorism regulations' effects on aid delivery in Palestine}}, year = {{2020}}, }