Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Shaping Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights for Persons with Disabilities: A Policy Discourse Analysis of SRHR Policies from the African Union

Isacson, Jeanna LU (2021) MIDM19 20211
Department of Human Geography
LUMID International Master programme in applied International Development and Management
Abstract
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) is suggested to be solved by policies and action plans. However, post-structural scholars argue that discourses shape policies, and their solutions. The policy discourse on women with disabilities’ SRHR needs has not been given much attention, especially in the context of Africa. Therefore, this study questions how SRHR is represented in relation to women with disabilities, specifically concerning contraception, gender-based violence (GBV), socio-environmental aspects and information, education and communication (ICE). To answer this, it draws on four questions from Bacchi’s post-structural ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’(WPR) approach. Three primary policy documents produced by the... (More)
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) is suggested to be solved by policies and action plans. However, post-structural scholars argue that discourses shape policies, and their solutions. The policy discourse on women with disabilities’ SRHR needs has not been given much attention, especially in the context of Africa. Therefore, this study questions how SRHR is represented in relation to women with disabilities, specifically concerning contraception, gender-based violence (GBV), socio-environmental aspects and information, education and communication (ICE). To answer this, it draws on four questions from Bacchi’s post-structural ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’(WPR) approach. Three primary policy documents produced by the African Union are selected for policy discourse analysis.
The findings suggest that the SRHR discourse continues to be represented along the lines of reproductive health. Contraception is encouraged and represented as an individual choice, but disregards unequal power relations in society. GBV is problematised in terms of legal strengthening, and women with disabilities seem to be constituted as SRHR subjects through the problematisation of GBV. SRHR is moreover represented in terms of a rural-urban binary, which mystifies disabling social structure. This is also noted in ICE for SRHR, representing homogenous service and a silent able/disable dichotomy. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Isacson, Jeanna LU
supervisor
organization
course
MIDM19 20211
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
African Union, discourse, power, policy analysis, problematisation, subjects, SRHR, women with disabilities, WPR approach
language
English
id
9044109
date added to LUP
2021-06-21 10:25:27
date last changed
2021-06-21 10:25:27
@misc{9044109,
  abstract     = {{Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) is suggested to be solved by policies and action plans. However, post-structural scholars argue that discourses shape policies, and their solutions. The policy discourse on women with disabilities’ SRHR needs has not been given much attention, especially in the context of Africa. Therefore, this study questions how SRHR is represented in relation to women with disabilities, specifically concerning contraception, gender-based violence (GBV), socio-environmental aspects and information, education and communication (ICE). To answer this, it draws on four questions from Bacchi’s post-structural ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’(WPR) approach. Three primary policy documents produced by the African Union are selected for policy discourse analysis. 
The findings suggest that the SRHR discourse continues to be represented along the lines of reproductive health. Contraception is encouraged and represented as an individual choice, but disregards unequal power relations in society. GBV is problematised in terms of legal strengthening, and women with disabilities seem to be constituted as SRHR subjects through the problematisation of GBV. SRHR is moreover represented in terms of a rural-urban binary, which mystifies disabling social structure. This is also noted in ICE for SRHR, representing homogenous service and a silent able/disable dichotomy.}},
  author       = {{Isacson, Jeanna}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Shaping Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights for Persons with Disabilities: A Policy Discourse Analysis of SRHR Policies from the African Union}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}