Lower-order or Higher-order? - A Study of Reading Comprehension Questions in Swedish Upper Secondary EFL Textbooks
(2022) ÄEND14 20212English Studies
- Abstract
- This study examines two Swedish EFL textbooks, Viewpoints 2 and Blueprint B, aimed at the English 6 course in Swedish upper secondary school. The aim of the study was to investigate the cognitive levels of reading comprehension questions accompanying literary excerpts in the two examined textbooks. This was done by categorising the reading comprehension questions into the cognitive levels of the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy: remember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate and create, to observe to what extent the cognitive levels occur and how this affects students’ learning opportunities. The textbooks were analysed by performing a qualitative content analysis to categorise all reading comprehension questions into the cognitive... (More)
- This study examines two Swedish EFL textbooks, Viewpoints 2 and Blueprint B, aimed at the English 6 course in Swedish upper secondary school. The aim of the study was to investigate the cognitive levels of reading comprehension questions accompanying literary excerpts in the two examined textbooks. This was done by categorising the reading comprehension questions into the cognitive levels of the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy: remember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate and create, to observe to what extent the cognitive levels occur and how this affects students’ learning opportunities. The textbooks were analysed by performing a qualitative content analysis to categorise all reading comprehension questions into the cognitive levels of the taxonomy and to find patterns in how the reading comprehension questions were phrased and what they require of the students.
The study found that both textbooks had a tendency towards including more lower-order reading comprehension questions than higher-order. A majority of the examined questions, between 70 and 71%, respectively, were categorised as lower-order. The most frequently occurring cognitive levels in the textbooks were remember and understand, respectively. A concluding recommendation is for teachers using or choosing textbooks for school to examine the frequency of lower-order and higher-order reading comprehension questions and to complement with extra questions if necessary. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9073924
- author
- Tiihonen, Caroline LU
- supervisor
-
- Jenny Siméus LU
- organization
- course
- ÄEND14 20212
- year
- 2022
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- EFL Textbooks, Bloom's Taxonomy, Reading Comprehension, Reading Comprehension Questions
- language
- English
- id
- 9073924
- date added to LUP
- 2022-04-11 11:16:00
- date last changed
- 2022-04-11 11:16:00
@misc{9073924, abstract = {{This study examines two Swedish EFL textbooks, Viewpoints 2 and Blueprint B, aimed at the English 6 course in Swedish upper secondary school. The aim of the study was to investigate the cognitive levels of reading comprehension questions accompanying literary excerpts in the two examined textbooks. This was done by categorising the reading comprehension questions into the cognitive levels of the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy: remember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate and create, to observe to what extent the cognitive levels occur and how this affects students’ learning opportunities. The textbooks were analysed by performing a qualitative content analysis to categorise all reading comprehension questions into the cognitive levels of the taxonomy and to find patterns in how the reading comprehension questions were phrased and what they require of the students. The study found that both textbooks had a tendency towards including more lower-order reading comprehension questions than higher-order. A majority of the examined questions, between 70 and 71%, respectively, were categorised as lower-order. The most frequently occurring cognitive levels in the textbooks were remember and understand, respectively. A concluding recommendation is for teachers using or choosing textbooks for school to examine the frequency of lower-order and higher-order reading comprehension questions and to complement with extra questions if necessary.}}, author = {{Tiihonen, Caroline}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Lower-order or Higher-order? - A Study of Reading Comprehension Questions in Swedish Upper Secondary EFL Textbooks}}, year = {{2022}}, }