Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Peace - What Is It Good For?

Bjuremalm, Mikael LU (2022) SIMZ11 20221
Graduate School
Abstract (Swedish)
The use of peace narratives in order to delegitimize political opposition has been observed in electoral autocracies. One such case was in Kenya in 2013, which gave rise to the theory of peaceocracy. Peaceocracy is conceptualized as being made up of six components, namely a fragile peace, incumbents cast as peacekeepers, peace as a responsibility of the citizenry, delegitimization of certain issues, curbing of oppositional participation in elections, and international support. By applying these criteria, this study has applied the concept of peaceocracy to the 2017 Kenyan elections through a narrative analysis, while also situating the theory in the larger field of peace research. The findings indicated that while there were attempts to... (More)
The use of peace narratives in order to delegitimize political opposition has been observed in electoral autocracies. One such case was in Kenya in 2013, which gave rise to the theory of peaceocracy. Peaceocracy is conceptualized as being made up of six components, namely a fragile peace, incumbents cast as peacekeepers, peace as a responsibility of the citizenry, delegitimization of certain issues, curbing of oppositional participation in elections, and international support. By applying these criteria, this study has applied the concept of peaceocracy to the 2017 Kenyan elections through a narrative analysis, while also situating the theory in the larger field of peace research. The findings indicated that while there were attempts to establish conditions of a peaceocracy, the opposition effectively used counter-narratives to contest issues that the government tried to remove from the political agenda, leading to only a partial occurrence of peaceocracy in 2017. Furthermore, the study suggests potential improvements for the theory, tying it to existing concepts in peace research such as everyday peace. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Bjuremalm, Mikael LU
supervisor
organization
alternative title
Analyzing the 2017 Kenyan elections using the theory of peaceocracy
course
SIMZ11 20221
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Peaceocracy, Kenya, electoral violence, hybrid regimes, peace and conflict studies
language
English
id
9083471
date added to LUP
2022-06-23 10:56:49
date last changed
2022-06-23 10:56:49
@misc{9083471,
  abstract     = {{The use of peace narratives in order to delegitimize political opposition has been observed in electoral autocracies. One such case was in Kenya in 2013, which gave rise to the theory of peaceocracy. Peaceocracy is conceptualized as being made up of six components, namely a fragile peace, incumbents cast as peacekeepers, peace as a responsibility of the citizenry, delegitimization of certain issues, curbing of oppositional participation in elections, and international support. By applying these criteria, this study has applied the concept of peaceocracy to the 2017 Kenyan elections through a narrative analysis, while also situating the theory in the larger field of peace research. The findings indicated that while there were attempts to establish conditions of a peaceocracy, the opposition effectively used counter-narratives to contest issues that the government tried to remove from the political agenda, leading to only a partial occurrence of peaceocracy in 2017. Furthermore, the study suggests potential improvements for the theory, tying it to existing concepts in peace research such as everyday peace.}},
  author       = {{Bjuremalm, Mikael}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Peace - What Is It Good For?}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}