Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The impact of democratic transitions on innovation. An empirical panel analysis of 168 countries from 1960-2019.

Flatz, Hannes LU (2022) EKHS34 20221
Department of Economic History
Abstract
This thesis empirically examines the impact of democratic transitions on innovation using a difference-in-differences method on a panel of 168 countries from 1960 to 2019. Patents, R&D expenditure, and scientific articles are employed as proxies for innovation. The results indicate that democratisations have a positive effect on patents. This association is significant for permanent democratisations and robust to various robustness checks. There is however no association reliably measurable for R&D expenditures and scientific articles on a global level. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the effect of transitions is more pronounced when a democratisation is sustained or permanent and that the impact on innovation varies among world... (More)
This thesis empirically examines the impact of democratic transitions on innovation using a difference-in-differences method on a panel of 168 countries from 1960 to 2019. Patents, R&D expenditure, and scientific articles are employed as proxies for innovation. The results indicate that democratisations have a positive effect on patents. This association is significant for permanent democratisations and robust to various robustness checks. There is however no association reliably measurable for R&D expenditures and scientific articles on a global level. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the effect of transitions is more pronounced when a democratisation is sustained or permanent and that the impact on innovation varies among world regions. Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean broadly resemble the global pattern, whereas democratisations in MENA and East- and South-East Asia exhibit a different one. Lastly, it is found that the higher the achieved level of democracy after democratisation, the greater the countries’ patent counts and R&D expenditures. Supportive international efforts should be increased to ensure that democratic transitions are sustained and that a higher level of democracy is reached. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Flatz, Hannes LU
supervisor
organization
course
EKHS34 20221
year
type
L1 - 1st term paper (old degree order)
subject
keywords
innovation, democratic transitions, political regimes, institutions, development
language
English
id
9101237
date added to LUP
2022-11-09 08:54:47
date last changed
2022-11-09 08:54:47
@misc{9101237,
  abstract     = {{This thesis empirically examines the impact of democratic transitions on innovation using a difference-in-differences method on a panel of 168 countries from 1960 to 2019. Patents, R&D expenditure, and scientific articles are employed as proxies for innovation. The results indicate that democratisations have a positive effect on patents. This association is significant for permanent democratisations and robust to various robustness checks. There is however no association reliably measurable for R&D expenditures and scientific articles on a global level. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the effect of transitions is more pronounced when a democratisation is sustained or permanent and that the impact on innovation varies among world regions. Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean broadly resemble the global pattern, whereas democratisations in MENA and East- and South-East Asia exhibit a different one. Lastly, it is found that the higher the achieved level of democracy after democratisation, the greater the countries’ patent counts and R&D expenditures. Supportive international efforts should be increased to ensure that democratic transitions are sustained and that a higher level of democracy is reached.}},
  author       = {{Flatz, Hannes}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{The impact of democratic transitions on innovation. An empirical panel analysis of 168 countries from 1960-2019.}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}