Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Digital Surveillance in the name of National Security

Kristiansson, Jacob LU (2023) STVK02 20222
Department of Political Science
Abstract
Surveillance has throughout history been a widely discussed phenomenon and the debate over the delicate balancing of state power vis-à-vis privacy in the pursuit of national security equally so. In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA had been conducting digital surveillance globally and it represents a tipping point in the history of surveillance. By applying the normative logics deontology and consequentialism, as well as the normative concept paternalism, an analysis has been made covering the reasonings and arguments behind both Snowden’s and the National Intelligence Agencies’ actions. This thesis has made visible how the logics and paternalism resonate both similarly and differently on the Snowden case. The research question... (More)
Surveillance has throughout history been a widely discussed phenomenon and the debate over the delicate balancing of state power vis-à-vis privacy in the pursuit of national security equally so. In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA had been conducting digital surveillance globally and it represents a tipping point in the history of surveillance. By applying the normative logics deontology and consequentialism, as well as the normative concept paternalism, an analysis has been made covering the reasonings and arguments behind both Snowden’s and the National Intelligence Agencies’ actions. This thesis has made visible how the logics and paternalism resonate both similarly and differently on the Snowden case. The research question was: Can it be justified to allow national intelligence agencies to infringe upon their citizens’ privacy through big data surveillance technologies in order to ensure national security? Oversimplified, the conclusions are that the duty-ethical strand of deontology means that it cannot be justified, meanwhile for the rights-based strand of deontology, moderate deontologists and consequentialists, it is dependent on whether one values citizens’ right to privacy or a state’s end of ensuring national security higher. Paternalism, viewed through the utilitarian strand of consequentialism, means that it cannot be justified, as the NSA’s paternalistic act cannot be deemed as exclusively rightful. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Kristiansson, Jacob LU
supervisor
organization
course
STVK02 20222
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Normative Analysis, Deontology, Consequentialism, Paternalism, Edward Snowden, National Security Agency, Surveillance, Big Data, Intelligence, Disclosures.
language
English
id
9105587
date added to LUP
2023-02-22 13:42:57
date last changed
2023-02-22 13:42:57
@misc{9105587,
  abstract     = {{Surveillance has throughout history been a widely discussed phenomenon and the debate over the delicate balancing of state power vis-à-vis privacy in the pursuit of national security equally so. In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA had been conducting digital surveillance globally and it represents a tipping point in the history of surveillance. By applying the normative logics deontology and consequentialism, as well as the normative concept paternalism, an analysis has been made covering the reasonings and arguments behind both Snowden’s and the National Intelligence Agencies’ actions. This thesis has made visible how the logics and paternalism resonate both similarly and differently on the Snowden case. The research question was: Can it be justified to allow national intelligence agencies to infringe upon their citizens’ privacy through big data surveillance technologies in order to ensure national security? Oversimplified, the conclusions are that the duty-ethical strand of deontology means that it cannot be justified, meanwhile for the rights-based strand of deontology, moderate deontologists and consequentialists, it is dependent on whether one values citizens’ right to privacy or a state’s end of ensuring national security higher. Paternalism, viewed through the utilitarian strand of consequentialism, means that it cannot be justified, as the NSA’s paternalistic act cannot be deemed as exclusively rightful.}},
  author       = {{Kristiansson, Jacob}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Digital Surveillance in the name of National Security}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}