The EU institutions' framing of the Covid crisis: from global pandemic to green recovery
(2022) SKOM12 20211Department of Strategic Communication
- Abstract (Swedish)
- This thesis aims to study how the legitimacy of the EU’s pandemic crisis response
in connection to green policies, in the interinstitutional exchange, is supported or undermined by connected frames and a subordinate master frame over the course
of the first six months of the unfolding pandemic. Six EU institutions’ residents, who “have a say” on economic crisis measures, were picked from the European Commission, Parliament, Council and Eurogroup and European Central Bank. In
the analysed period from January to June 2020, the presidents’ speeches and
statements (transcripts), centred on economics were searched for green aspects. Of
the 35 which mention green policies, a qualitative framing analysis in a longitudinal design was... (More) - This thesis aims to study how the legitimacy of the EU’s pandemic crisis response
in connection to green policies, in the interinstitutional exchange, is supported or undermined by connected frames and a subordinate master frame over the course
of the first six months of the unfolding pandemic. Six EU institutions’ residents, who “have a say” on economic crisis measures, were picked from the European Commission, Parliament, Council and Eurogroup and European Central Bank. In
the analysed period from January to June 2020, the presidents’ speeches and
statements (transcripts), centred on economics were searched for green aspects. Of
the 35 which mention green policies, a qualitative framing analysis in a longitudinal design was conducted. Crisis phases, with fluent borders, were identified (“at the doorstep”; first peak; crisis measures for long-term recovery; Next Generation EU) marking differences in how green policies were integrated in frames. For a few weeks, urgent crisis measures relegated long-term agendas, such as the green one, to the background; besides, there were little indications of green policies as a secondary concern. In contrast, the crisis was soon framed as an opportunity, giving green policies additional momentum, integrating green in recovery and resilience, and to address future generations (also to justify public spending). The presidents communicated the EU institutions’ unity, and little conflict was present.
The thesis observed a master frame of a green and digital transition propelling the recovery and resilience for future generations, which developed during the crisis and through the presidents’ address in their frames. Aligning the agenda of two public interests, the pandemic response and climate change mitigation, in frames was identified as a strategy for maintaining the EU’s legitimacy. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9113820
- author
- Lorenz, Philipp Arian LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- SKOM12 20211
- year
- 2022
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- framing analysis, crisis communication, EU institutions, legitimacy.
- language
- English
- id
- 9113820
- date added to LUP
- 2023-05-04 16:45:59
- date last changed
- 2023-05-04 16:46:12
@misc{9113820, abstract = {{This thesis aims to study how the legitimacy of the EU’s pandemic crisis response in connection to green policies, in the interinstitutional exchange, is supported or undermined by connected frames and a subordinate master frame over the course of the first six months of the unfolding pandemic. Six EU institutions’ residents, who “have a say” on economic crisis measures, were picked from the European Commission, Parliament, Council and Eurogroup and European Central Bank. In the analysed period from January to June 2020, the presidents’ speeches and statements (transcripts), centred on economics were searched for green aspects. Of the 35 which mention green policies, a qualitative framing analysis in a longitudinal design was conducted. Crisis phases, with fluent borders, were identified (“at the doorstep”; first peak; crisis measures for long-term recovery; Next Generation EU) marking differences in how green policies were integrated in frames. For a few weeks, urgent crisis measures relegated long-term agendas, such as the green one, to the background; besides, there were little indications of green policies as a secondary concern. In contrast, the crisis was soon framed as an opportunity, giving green policies additional momentum, integrating green in recovery and resilience, and to address future generations (also to justify public spending). The presidents communicated the EU institutions’ unity, and little conflict was present. The thesis observed a master frame of a green and digital transition propelling the recovery and resilience for future generations, which developed during the crisis and through the presidents’ address in their frames. Aligning the agenda of two public interests, the pandemic response and climate change mitigation, in frames was identified as a strategy for maintaining the EU’s legitimacy.}}, author = {{Lorenz, Philipp Arian}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{The EU institutions' framing of the Covid crisis: from global pandemic to green recovery}}, year = {{2022}}, }