Varför fattade man så olika beslut avseende Försvarsmaktens logistik 2012 respektive 2017?
(2024) STVU15 20241Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- In 2012 a decision was made that half of the defence logistic organisation and personel in the Swedisch Armed Forces (SAF) should move to the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV). This decision was made after a period of downsizing the SAF and the purpose was shifted from national defence to international EU, UN and NATO commitments. Approximately 1 500 individuals working in logistics were moved from the SAF to FMV. In 2017 a new decision was made and the same number was now moved back to the SAF with the enclosed responsibilities. The purpsose of the Swedish defence was again shifted back to national defence and growth. This case study is about explaining why these governmental decisions were made, only five years apart. The... (More)
- In 2012 a decision was made that half of the defence logistic organisation and personel in the Swedisch Armed Forces (SAF) should move to the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV). This decision was made after a period of downsizing the SAF and the purpose was shifted from national defence to international EU, UN and NATO commitments. Approximately 1 500 individuals working in logistics were moved from the SAF to FMV. In 2017 a new decision was made and the same number was now moved back to the SAF with the enclosed responsibilities. The purpsose of the Swedish defence was again shifted back to national defence and growth. This case study is about explaining why these governmental decisions were made, only five years apart. The onset of the study is to use Allison´s models of rational actor and governmental politics. With the base of these two models compare them using the method of Blatter&Haverland´s congruens analysis to decide which explanation would suit best. In the study I have concluded that both the rational actor and the governmental model can together explain why these two decisions were made and that the models in fact complete each other. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9151172
- author
- Gustafsson, Niklas LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- Fabriksåterställning eller omstart?
- course
- STVU15 20241
- year
- 2024
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Försvarslogistik, kongruensanalys, Förvarets materielverk, Allison.
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9151172
- date added to LUP
- 2024-05-24 11:11:00
- date last changed
- 2024-05-24 11:11:00
@misc{9151172,
abstract = {{In 2012 a decision was made that half of the defence logistic organisation and personel in the Swedisch Armed Forces (SAF) should move to the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV). This decision was made after a period of downsizing the SAF and the purpose was shifted from national defence to international EU, UN and NATO commitments. Approximately 1 500 individuals working in logistics were moved from the SAF to FMV. In 2017 a new decision was made and the same number was now moved back to the SAF with the enclosed responsibilities. The purpsose of the Swedish defence was again shifted back to national defence and growth. This case study is about explaining why these governmental decisions were made, only five years apart. The onset of the study is to use Allison´s models of rational actor and governmental politics. With the base of these two models compare them using the method of Blatter&Haverland´s congruens analysis to decide which explanation would suit best. In the study I have concluded that both the rational actor and the governmental model can together explain why these two decisions were made and that the models in fact complete each other.}},
author = {{Gustafsson, Niklas}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Varför fattade man så olika beslut avseende Försvarsmaktens logistik 2012 respektive 2017?}},
year = {{2024}},
}