Investigating Buyer Preferences in Climate Finance Under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement
(2024) In IIIEE Masters Thesis IMEM01 20241The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics
- Abstract (Swedish)
- This thesis investigates buyer preferences in the procurement of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs) under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, which facilitates international cooperation through carbon markets. As ITMO markets are still in the early stages of development, uncertainties regarding regulatory frameworks, environmental integrity, and procurement strategies have emerged, impacting the pace of engagement by both sovereign and private actors.
The research aims to examine the behavior, motivations, and strategies of parties engaging in ITMO transactions, with a focus on understanding how buyers prioritize carbon quality and non-carbon attributes such as co-benefits. The study specifically addresses the... (More) - This thesis investigates buyer preferences in the procurement of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs) under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, which facilitates international cooperation through carbon markets. As ITMO markets are still in the early stages of development, uncertainties regarding regulatory frameworks, environmental integrity, and procurement strategies have emerged, impacting the pace of engagement by both sovereign and private actors.
The research aims to examine the behavior, motivations, and strategies of parties engaging in ITMO transactions, with a focus on understanding how buyers prioritize carbon quality and non-carbon attributes such as co-benefits. The study specifically addresses the research questions: (1) What are the current procurement practices of parties under the Article 6.2 framework regarding ITMOs? (2) What is the potential for Article 6.2 to contribute to global net-zero emissions by 2050?
Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with experts from various sectors, including governments, NGOs, and carbon market participants. Document analysis of Mitigation Activity Design Documents (MADDs) and Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) supplemented the interview data. The analysis focused on key themes, including behavioral influences, environmental integrity, and co-benefits.
The findings indicate that early movers in the ITMO market exhibit risk-averse behavior, prioritizing low-risk technological projects with minimal emphasis on non-carbon attributes. This cautious approach has implications for market growth and environmental integrity, as buyers focus on compliance rather than innovation.
The thesis concludes that, without stronger regulatory oversight and a more ambitious approach from buyers, the potential for Article 6.2 to drive meaningful progress toward net-zero emissions by 2050 is limited. Recommendations include increasing centralized oversight and encouraging public-private partnerships to enhance market integrity. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9176996
- author
- Schultheis, Simon LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- A qualitative stakeholder analysis of actors involved in procuring Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs)
- course
- IMEM01 20241
- year
- 2024
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- CORSIA, Corresponding Adjustment, Carbon Markets, CDM, Cooperative Approaches
- publication/series
- IIIEE Masters Thesis
- report number
- 2024.38
- ISSN
- 1401-9191
- language
- English
- id
- 9176996
- date added to LUP
- 2024-10-24 10:19:09
- date last changed
- 2024-10-24 10:19:09
@misc{9176996, abstract = {{This thesis investigates buyer preferences in the procurement of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs) under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, which facilitates international cooperation through carbon markets. As ITMO markets are still in the early stages of development, uncertainties regarding regulatory frameworks, environmental integrity, and procurement strategies have emerged, impacting the pace of engagement by both sovereign and private actors. The research aims to examine the behavior, motivations, and strategies of parties engaging in ITMO transactions, with a focus on understanding how buyers prioritize carbon quality and non-carbon attributes such as co-benefits. The study specifically addresses the research questions: (1) What are the current procurement practices of parties under the Article 6.2 framework regarding ITMOs? (2) What is the potential for Article 6.2 to contribute to global net-zero emissions by 2050? Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with experts from various sectors, including governments, NGOs, and carbon market participants. Document analysis of Mitigation Activity Design Documents (MADDs) and Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) supplemented the interview data. The analysis focused on key themes, including behavioral influences, environmental integrity, and co-benefits. The findings indicate that early movers in the ITMO market exhibit risk-averse behavior, prioritizing low-risk technological projects with minimal emphasis on non-carbon attributes. This cautious approach has implications for market growth and environmental integrity, as buyers focus on compliance rather than innovation. The thesis concludes that, without stronger regulatory oversight and a more ambitious approach from buyers, the potential for Article 6.2 to drive meaningful progress toward net-zero emissions by 2050 is limited. Recommendations include increasing centralized oversight and encouraging public-private partnerships to enhance market integrity.}}, author = {{Schultheis, Simon}}, issn = {{1401-9191}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, series = {{IIIEE Masters Thesis}}, title = {{Investigating Buyer Preferences in Climate Finance Under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement}}, year = {{2024}}, }