Guns, Growth & Government
(2025) IBUH19 20251Department of Business Administration
- Abstract
- This thesis investigates how national institutional architectures mediate the effectiveness of government
support in shaping the international success of military-industrial firms. Through a comparative case
study of SAAB (Sweden) and Rheinmetall AG (Germany), it analyzes firm performance across export
capability, profitability, and dual-use innovation. Despite similar product domains, the firms are
embedded in contrasting institutional fields: Sweden’s coordinated model versus Germany’s more
liberal, market-led system.
Combining extended Institutional Theory with a state-enabled Resource-Based View, the study
conceptualizes performance as co-produced through institutional field thickness, temporal layering, and
public-enabled VRIN... (More) - This thesis investigates how national institutional architectures mediate the effectiveness of government
support in shaping the international success of military-industrial firms. Through a comparative case
study of SAAB (Sweden) and Rheinmetall AG (Germany), it analyzes firm performance across export
capability, profitability, and dual-use innovation. Despite similar product domains, the firms are
embedded in contrasting institutional fields: Sweden’s coordinated model versus Germany’s more
liberal, market-led system.
Combining extended Institutional Theory with a state-enabled Resource-Based View, the study
conceptualizes performance as co-produced through institutional field thickness, temporal layering, and
public-enabled VRIN resources. Drawing on longitudinal data from firm archives and state sources, it
finds that Saab’s success was enabled by integrated procurement, R&D, and export mechanisms.
Rheinmetall, by contrast, relied on internal capabilities and institutional work to navigate regulatory
constraints.
The findings show that institutional structure, not merely the presence of state support, shapes the
formation and deployment of strategic capabilities in defence sectors. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9212116
- author
- Ehrnborg, Viktor LU ; Kojouharov Sjögren, Elliot LU and Börjeson Kennedy, Connor LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- IBUH19 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Keywords: Military-industrial firms, Institutional theory, Export capability, Profitability, Dual-use innovation, Saab, Rheinmetall, Resource-Based View (RBV), Comparative case study, Longitudinal analysis
- language
- English
- id
- 9212116
- date added to LUP
- 2025-09-10 16:07:13
- date last changed
- 2025-09-10 16:07:13
@misc{9212116, abstract = {{This thesis investigates how national institutional architectures mediate the effectiveness of government support in shaping the international success of military-industrial firms. Through a comparative case study of SAAB (Sweden) and Rheinmetall AG (Germany), it analyzes firm performance across export capability, profitability, and dual-use innovation. Despite similar product domains, the firms are embedded in contrasting institutional fields: Sweden’s coordinated model versus Germany’s more liberal, market-led system. Combining extended Institutional Theory with a state-enabled Resource-Based View, the study conceptualizes performance as co-produced through institutional field thickness, temporal layering, and public-enabled VRIN resources. Drawing on longitudinal data from firm archives and state sources, it finds that Saab’s success was enabled by integrated procurement, R&D, and export mechanisms. Rheinmetall, by contrast, relied on internal capabilities and institutional work to navigate regulatory constraints. The findings show that institutional structure, not merely the presence of state support, shapes the formation and deployment of strategic capabilities in defence sectors.}}, author = {{Ehrnborg, Viktor and Kojouharov Sjögren, Elliot and Börjeson Kennedy, Connor}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Guns, Growth & Government}}, year = {{2025}}, }