Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Detection of aeroelastic instabilities for floating offshore wind turbines

Muren, Axel LU (2026) VBKM01 20261
Division of Structural Engineering
Abstract
This thesis investigates the risks associated with aeroelastic instabilities for floating offshore wind turbines. This was done through a literature study and an analysis of fleet data from currently deployed floating wind farms. The aim was to understand how turbine VIV and rotor VIV affect floating turbines compared to bottom-fixed ones, and to try to improve the automated detection process of these aeroelastic instabilities by setting thresholds for the nacelle acceleration and the blade load sensors based on the results of this study. From these thresholds, the goal was to propose how these can be scaled up for large-rotor floating wind turbines in the future, discussing how moving up in rotor-size might affect the risk associated with... (More)
This thesis investigates the risks associated with aeroelastic instabilities for floating offshore wind turbines. This was done through a literature study and an analysis of fleet data from currently deployed floating wind farms. The aim was to understand how turbine VIV and rotor VIV affect floating turbines compared to bottom-fixed ones, and to try to improve the automated detection process of these aeroelastic instabilities by setting thresholds for the nacelle acceleration and the blade load sensors based on the results of this study. From these thresholds, the goal was to propose how these can be scaled up for large-rotor floating wind turbines in the future, discussing how moving up in rotor-size might affect the risk associated with turbine VIV and rotor VIV. The results suggested that turbines on a floating platform were less susceptible to turbine VIV, compared to bottom-fixed turbines, but saw higher values of nacelle acceleration in general from wave impact. The same trend is believed to be true for larger turbines. For rotor VIV, the conclusion was that it is not floating-driven, and that larger-rotor turbines are expected to behave similar to their bottom-fixed counterparts. (Less)
Popular Abstract
Floating wind turbines may sound impossible at first but is actually a very promising concept that already has established itself on the renewable energy market. They have the advantage of being deployed at deeper waters, where traditional bottom-fixed offshore wind turbines are no longer economically feasible. At these deeper waters, the winds are stronger and more consistent. This allows for a more even electricity production, which is exactly what wind energy is lacking today.

To ensure that the turbines remain operational and intact for their expected lifetime, this study aims to improve the detection process of vibrations in the rotor blades and the turbine tower, allowing operators to deal with them before the structure breaks... (More)
Floating wind turbines may sound impossible at first but is actually a very promising concept that already has established itself on the renewable energy market. They have the advantage of being deployed at deeper waters, where traditional bottom-fixed offshore wind turbines are no longer economically feasible. At these deeper waters, the winds are stronger and more consistent. This allows for a more even electricity production, which is exactly what wind energy is lacking today.

To ensure that the turbines remain operational and intact for their expected lifetime, this study aims to improve the detection process of vibrations in the rotor blades and the turbine tower, allowing operators to deal with them before the structure breaks down. Specifically, it assesses the risk of vortex-induced vibrations (VIV).

The results were reassuring and indicated that floating turbines are not more prone to VIV in the rotor blades than bottom-fixed ones, and they are actually less prone to vibrations in the turbine tower. This is attributed to the higher natural frequency of the towers on floating platforms, meaning that the wind speeds required for VIV to occur in the tower are far higher than for the same turbine on a bottom-fixed foundation.

In the past decade, bottom-fixed turbines have grown to colossal sizes, and researchers believe that this trend will hold true for floating turbines as well. To prepare for this, this study scales the findings to larger floating turbines of the future. The conclusions show that the blades of large-rotor floating turbines will likely not see more vibrations than their bottom-fixed counterparts, but the risk of tower vibrations is harder to predict. If larger turbines behave similarly to the ones analysed in this study, the risk will remain low. However, scaling up also means dealing with much heavier components on an unstable sea, a challenge that will require the wind industry to develop larger, more stable service and installation vessels in the decades to come. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Muren, Axel LU
supervisor
organization
alternative title
Detektering av aeroelastiska instabiliteter för flytande havsbaserade vindkraftverk
course
VBKM01 20261
year
type
H3 - Professional qualifications (4 Years - )
subject
keywords
Wind turbine, Wind energy, Aerodynamics, Aeroelasticity, Vortex shedding, Vibrations
report number
26/5318
ISSN
0349-4969
other publication id
LUTVDG/TVBK/26/5318
language
English
additional info
Examinator: Ivar Björnsson
id
9240507
date added to LUP
2026-06-22 10:46:25
date last changed
2026-06-22 10:46:25
@misc{9240507,
  abstract     = {{This thesis investigates the risks associated with aeroelastic instabilities for floating offshore wind turbines. This was done through a literature study and an analysis of fleet data from currently deployed floating wind farms. The aim was to understand how turbine VIV and rotor VIV affect floating turbines compared to bottom-fixed ones, and to try to improve the automated detection process of these aeroelastic instabilities by setting thresholds for the nacelle acceleration and the blade load sensors based on the results of this study. From these thresholds, the goal was to propose how these can be scaled up for large-rotor floating wind turbines in the future, discussing how moving up in rotor-size might affect the risk associated with turbine VIV and rotor VIV. The results suggested that turbines on a floating platform were less susceptible to turbine VIV, compared to bottom-fixed turbines, but saw higher values of nacelle acceleration in general from wave impact. The same trend is believed to be true for larger turbines. For rotor VIV, the conclusion was that it is not floating-driven, and that larger-rotor turbines are expected to behave similar to their bottom-fixed counterparts.}},
  author       = {{Muren, Axel}},
  issn         = {{0349-4969}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Detection of aeroelastic instabilities for floating offshore wind turbines}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}