Speaking, Being and Resisting: Linguistic Decolonization and Identity Negotiation among Ukrainians with Russian as Their First Language
(2026) ÖCKR07 20261Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology
Central and Eastern European Studies
- Abstract
- This thesis examines how Ukrainians with Russian as their first language negotiate linguistic identity in relation to national and ethnic identity during Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine. Drawing on postcolonial approaches to language, linguistic imperialism, standard language ideology and hybridity, it asks how participants relate to Russian and Ukrainian, how they reflect on linguistic norms, and to what extent linguistic subversion is a useful lens for understanding decolonial language practices. The study is based on semi-structured qualitative interviews with seven Ukrainians currently living in Sweden. The findings show that participants consistently separate Russian language use from Russian national belonging, while... (More)
- This thesis examines how Ukrainians with Russian as their first language negotiate linguistic identity in relation to national and ethnic identity during Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine. Drawing on postcolonial approaches to language, linguistic imperialism, standard language ideology and hybridity, it asks how participants relate to Russian and Ukrainian, how they reflect on linguistic norms, and to what extent linguistic subversion is a useful lens for understanding decolonial language practices. The study is based on semi-structured qualitative interviews with seven Ukrainians currently living in Sweden. The findings show that participants consistently separate Russian language use from Russian national belonging, while reallocating Russian and Ukrainian to different social domains. Russian is primarily associated with intimacy, family, memory and embodied selfhood, whereas Ukrainian is linked to public legitimacy, collective identity and national belonging. Participants generally reproduce elements of standard language ideology, although attitudes towards surzhyk have become more accepting. Linguistic subversion offers only limited explanatory value: decolonization appears more clearly through language shift, changing linguistic functions and the weakening of Russian metropolitan authority than through deliberate transformation of Russian from within. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9250382
- author
- Svenborn Johansson, Eva LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- ÖCKR07 20261
- year
- 2026
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- linguistic decolonization, Ukraine, Russian language, postcolonialism, standard language ideology
- language
- English
- id
- 9250382
- date added to LUP
- 2026-09-25 09:53:10
- date last changed
- 2026-09-25 09:53:10
@misc{9250382,
abstract = {{This thesis examines how Ukrainians with Russian as their first language negotiate linguistic identity in relation to national and ethnic identity during Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine. Drawing on postcolonial approaches to language, linguistic imperialism, standard language ideology and hybridity, it asks how participants relate to Russian and Ukrainian, how they reflect on linguistic norms, and to what extent linguistic subversion is a useful lens for understanding decolonial language practices. The study is based on semi-structured qualitative interviews with seven Ukrainians currently living in Sweden. The findings show that participants consistently separate Russian language use from Russian national belonging, while reallocating Russian and Ukrainian to different social domains. Russian is primarily associated with intimacy, family, memory and embodied selfhood, whereas Ukrainian is linked to public legitimacy, collective identity and national belonging. Participants generally reproduce elements of standard language ideology, although attitudes towards surzhyk have become more accepting. Linguistic subversion offers only limited explanatory value: decolonization appears more clearly through language shift, changing linguistic functions and the weakening of Russian metropolitan authority than through deliberate transformation of Russian from within.}},
author = {{Svenborn Johansson, Eva}},
language = {{eng}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Speaking, Being and Resisting: Linguistic Decolonization and Identity Negotiation among Ukrainians with Russian as Their First Language}},
year = {{2026}},
}