Advanced

Discources, actors and instruments in international forest governance

Arts, Bas; Appelstrand, Marie LU ; Kleinschmit, Daniela; Pülzl, Helga and Vissen-Hamakers, Ingrid (2010) In IUFRO World series 28. p.57-73
Abstract
Politics are not only about interests and institutions but discourses as well. Discourses are (dominant) ideas, concepts and categorisations in a society that give meaning to reality and that shape the identities, interests and preferences of individuals and groups. The assumption of this chapter is that forest discourses are constitutive to global forest politics. Three forest-related types of discourses are distinguished: meta discourses that relate to global economics, politics and culture; regulatory discourses that deal with the regulation and instrumentation of policy issues; and forest discourses that shape forest issues and policies in specific ways. On the basis of a scientific literature review, the main discourses within these... (More)
Politics are not only about interests and institutions but discourses as well. Discourses are (dominant) ideas, concepts and categorisations in a society that give meaning to reality and that shape the identities, interests and preferences of individuals and groups. The assumption of this chapter is that forest discourses are constitutive to global forest politics. Three forest-related types of discourses are distinguished: meta discourses that relate to global economics, politics and culture; regulatory discourses that deal with the regulation and instrumentation of policy issues; and forest discourses that shape forest issues and policies in specific ways. On the basis of a scientific literature review, the main discourses within these three categories (meta, regulatory and forest discourses) as well as three regional forest discourses (Africa, Asia and Latin-America) are analysed. This analysis leads to a number of policy messages: (1) policy makers should try to understand and embrace discursive complexity (instead of artificially reducing it); (2) awareness of this discursive complexity improves global forest negotiations; (3) orchestrated collective action might lead to discursive change; and (4) there is a need for new, open, discursive arenas to improve global forest policymaking. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
regulatory discourse, global forest policy, meta discourse, forest discourse
in
IUFRO World series
volume
28
pages
57 - 73
publisher
IUFRO
ISBN
978-3-902762-01-6
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
d58ecfa0-bbca-449d-afaa-cd641654aa24 (old id 2167319)
date added to LUP
2011-10-11 16:22:58
date last changed
2016-04-16 09:35:19
@misc{d58ecfa0-bbca-449d-afaa-cd641654aa24,
  abstract     = {Politics are not only about interests and institutions but discourses as well. Discourses are (dominant) ideas, concepts and categorisations in a society that give meaning to reality and that shape the identities, interests and preferences of individuals and groups. The assumption of this chapter is that forest discourses are constitutive to global forest politics. Three forest-related types of discourses are distinguished: meta discourses that relate to global economics, politics and culture; regulatory discourses that deal with the regulation and instrumentation of policy issues; and forest discourses that shape forest issues and policies in specific ways. On the basis of a scientific literature review, the main discourses within these three categories (meta, regulatory and forest discourses) as well as three regional forest discourses (Africa, Asia and Latin-America) are analysed. This analysis leads to a number of policy messages: (1) policy makers should try to understand and embrace discursive complexity (instead of artificially reducing it); (2) awareness of this discursive complexity improves global forest negotiations; (3) orchestrated collective action might lead to discursive change; and (4) there is a need for new, open, discursive arenas to improve global forest policymaking.},
  author       = {Arts, Bas and Appelstrand, Marie and Kleinschmit, Daniela and Pülzl, Helga and Vissen-Hamakers, Ingrid},
  isbn         = {978-3-902762-01-6},
  keyword      = {regulatory discourse,global forest policy,meta discourse,forest discourse},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {57--73},
  publisher    = {ARRAY(0x916b748)},
  series       = {IUFRO World series},
  title        = {Discources, actors and instruments in international forest governance},
  volume       = {28},
  year         = {2010},
}