Advanced

Evaluation of the injection force dynamics of a modified prefilled insulin pen

Rissler, Jenny LU ; Jorgensen, C; Hansen, M R and Hansen, N-A (2008) In Expert Opinion 9(13). p.2217-2222
Abstract
Objective: A modified version of the widely used pen FlexPen® (FP), called Next Generation FlexPen® (NGFP), has been designed to reduce the injection force with this pen. In this study, the injection force of NGFP was compared with another insulin pen, SoloStar® (SS). Research design/methods: The injection force of 24 pens of each type: NGFP fitted with a NovoFine® 32G Tip ETW 6 mm needle; SS fitted with a NovoFine® 32G Tip needle and SS fitted with a BD Micro-Fine™ 31G thin wall 5 mm needle, were tested during the delivery of 60 IU insulin at three constant push-button speeds - 4, 6 or 8 mm/s. Results: NGFP had the lowest mean (± standard deviation) injection force at all injection speeds (8.3 ± 0.6, 12.0 ± 0.9 and 16.2 ± 1.3 N at 4, 6... (More)
Objective: A modified version of the widely used pen FlexPen® (FP), called Next Generation FlexPen® (NGFP), has been designed to reduce the injection force with this pen. In this study, the injection force of NGFP was compared with another insulin pen, SoloStar® (SS). Research design/methods: The injection force of 24 pens of each type: NGFP fitted with a NovoFine® 32G Tip ETW 6 mm needle; SS fitted with a NovoFine® 32G Tip needle and SS fitted with a BD Micro-Fine™ 31G thin wall 5 mm needle, were tested during the delivery of 60 IU insulin at three constant push-button speeds - 4, 6 or 8 mm/s. Results: NGFP had the lowest mean (± standard deviation) injection force at all injection speeds (8.3 ± 0.6, 12.0 ± 0.9 and 16.2 ± 1.3 N at 4, 6 and 8 mm/s, respectively) – for SS fitted with a NovoFine 32G Tip needle the corresponding values were 10.2 ± 1.1, 15.7 ± 1.5 and 22.3 ± 1.1 N, and for SS fitted with a BD Micro-Fine 31G needle they were 12.9 ± 0.8, 20.5 ± 1.3 and 29.6 ± 1.9 N. This corresponded to an 18 – 45% lower injection force with NGFP. The time to complete each dose delivery (including the time manufacturers’ recommend that the needle is left in situ after delivering the dose) was 14.2, 11.5 and 10.1 s with NGFP at injection speeds of 4, 6 and 8 mm/s, respectively, and were 16.4, 14.3 and 13.2 s with SS, respectively. Conclusions: This study shows that NGFP has a significantly lower injection force than SS at three specific push-button speeds. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Expert Opinion
volume
9
issue
13
pages
2217 - 2222
publisher
Informa Healthcare
external identifiers
  • Scopus:52049099836
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
2cd16c3e-b025-44b2-974d-4938043fb841 (old id 4253782)
date added to LUP
2014-02-12 10:14:51
date last changed
2016-10-30 04:38:04
@misc{2cd16c3e-b025-44b2-974d-4938043fb841,
  abstract     = {Objective: A modified version of the widely used pen FlexPen® (FP), called Next Generation FlexPen® (NGFP), has been designed to reduce the injection force with this pen. In this study, the injection force of NGFP was compared with another insulin pen, SoloStar® (SS). Research design/methods: The injection force of 24 pens of each type: NGFP fitted with a NovoFine® 32G Tip ETW 6 mm needle; SS fitted with a NovoFine® 32G Tip needle and SS fitted with a BD Micro-Fine™ 31G thin wall 5 mm needle, were tested during the delivery of 60 IU insulin at three constant push-button speeds - 4, 6 or 8 mm/s. Results: NGFP had the lowest mean (± standard deviation) injection force at all injection speeds (8.3 ± 0.6, 12.0 ± 0.9 and 16.2 ± 1.3 N at 4, 6 and 8 mm/s, respectively) – for SS fitted with a NovoFine 32G Tip needle the corresponding values were 10.2 ± 1.1, 15.7 ± 1.5 and 22.3 ± 1.1 N, and for SS fitted with a BD Micro-Fine 31G needle they were 12.9 ± 0.8, 20.5 ± 1.3 and 29.6 ± 1.9 N. This corresponded to an 18 – 45% lower injection force with NGFP. The time to complete each dose delivery (including the time manufacturers’ recommend that the needle is left in situ after delivering the dose) was 14.2, 11.5 and 10.1 s with NGFP at injection speeds of 4, 6 and 8 mm/s, respectively, and were 16.4, 14.3 and 13.2 s with SS, respectively. Conclusions: This study shows that NGFP has a significantly lower injection force than SS at three specific push-button speeds.},
  author       = {Rissler, Jenny and Jorgensen, C and Hansen, M R and Hansen, N-A},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {13},
  pages        = {2217--2222},
  publisher    = {ARRAY(0x5d4d200)},
  series       = {Expert Opinion},
  title        = {Evaluation of the injection force dynamics of a modified prefilled insulin pen},
  volume       = {9},
  year         = {2008},
}