Advanced

Why Are Some Nations More Successful Than Others in Research Impact? A Comparison Between Denmark and Sweden

Öquist, Gunnar and Benner, Mats LU (2015) In Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations p.241-257
Abstract
Bibliometric impact analyses show that Swedish research has less international visibility than Danish research. When taking a global view on all subject fields and selecting publications cited higher than the 90th percentile, i.e., the Top 10 %—publications, the Swedish Research Council shows that although Sweden ranks 15 % above world average, Denmark, the Netherlands and Switzerland rank 35–40 % above. To explain these different performances, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences asked us to compare the national research systems on three levels: priority setting at national level, governance of universities and direction and funding of research. There are of course many similarities between the Danish and Swedish research systems but... (More)
Bibliometric impact analyses show that Swedish research has less international visibility than Danish research. When taking a global view on all subject fields and selecting publications cited higher than the 90th percentile, i.e., the Top 10 %—publications, the Swedish Research Council shows that although Sweden ranks 15 % above world average, Denmark, the Netherlands and Switzerland rank 35–40 % above. To explain these different performances, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences asked us to compare the national research systems on three levels: priority setting at national level, governance of universities and direction and funding of research. There are of course many similarities between the Danish and Swedish research systems but there are still subtle differences that have developed over time, which may explain the different international visibility. First of all, it does not depend on different levels of public spending on research and development. However, the core funding of universities relative external funding is higher in Denmark than in Sweden. The academic leadership of Danish universities in terms of board, vice-chancellor, faculty dean and department chair is also more coherent and focused on priority setting, recruitment, organization and deployment of resources to establish research environments that operate at the forefront of international research. On all these points we see a weaker leadership in Sweden. Furthermore, over the last 20 years, public funding of research in Sweden has become more and more unpredictable and program oriented with many new actors, while the Danish funding system, although it also has developed over time, shows more consistency with strong actors to fund individuals with novel ideas. The research policy in Sweden has also developed multiple, sometimes even conflicting goals, which have undermined conditions for high-impact research, while in Denmark a policy to support excellence in research has been more coherent. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
in
Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations
editor
Welpe, Isabell M.; Wollersheim, Jutta; Ringelhan, Stefanie and Osterloh, Margit
pages
241 - 257
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • Scopus:84944611681
ISBN
978-3-319-09785-5
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_15
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
74445c2a-7e24-4885-bdc8-f219770cabc8 (old id 4814877)
date added to LUP
2014-12-01 10:03:59
date last changed
2016-10-13 04:43:08
@misc{74445c2a-7e24-4885-bdc8-f219770cabc8,
  abstract     = {Bibliometric impact analyses show that Swedish research has less international visibility than Danish research. When taking a global view on all subject fields and selecting publications cited higher than the 90th percentile, i.e., the Top 10 %—publications, the Swedish Research Council shows that although Sweden ranks 15 % above world average, Denmark, the Netherlands and Switzerland rank 35–40 % above. To explain these different performances, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences asked us to compare the national research systems on three levels: priority setting at national level, governance of universities and direction and funding of research. There are of course many similarities between the Danish and Swedish research systems but there are still subtle differences that have developed over time, which may explain the different international visibility. First of all, it does not depend on different levels of public spending on research and development. However, the core funding of universities relative external funding is higher in Denmark than in Sweden. The academic leadership of Danish universities in terms of board, vice-chancellor, faculty dean and department chair is also more coherent and focused on priority setting, recruitment, organization and deployment of resources to establish research environments that operate at the forefront of international research. On all these points we see a weaker leadership in Sweden. Furthermore, over the last 20 years, public funding of research in Sweden has become more and more unpredictable and program oriented with many new actors, while the Danish funding system, although it also has developed over time, shows more consistency with strong actors to fund individuals with novel ideas. The research policy in Sweden has also developed multiple, sometimes even conflicting goals, which have undermined conditions for high-impact research, while in Denmark a policy to support excellence in research has been more coherent.},
  author       = {Öquist, Gunnar and Benner, Mats},
  editor       = {Welpe, Isabell M. and Wollersheim, Jutta and Ringelhan, Stefanie and Osterloh, Margit},
  isbn         = {978-3-319-09785-5},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {241--257},
  publisher    = {ARRAY(0xabc9280)},
  series       = {Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations},
  title        = {Why Are Some Nations More Successful Than Others in Research Impact? A Comparison Between Denmark and Sweden},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_15},
  year         = {2015},
}