Transformation to a Market Economy and Changing Social Values in China, Russia, and Eastern Germany
(2008)- Abstract
- As a social change, the sudden collapse of communism1 should well be remembered as one of the most formative events of the 20th century. As a political transformation, it caused an initial rush of euphoria within the 'victorious' West and a wave of hope followed by disillusionment for hundreds of millions in the newly ‘democratic’ sphere. As an economic transformation, its effects were even more tangible, for they implied changes within everyday life through the shift from a centrally planned to a market economy. The rules, opportunities, and challenges presented by the basic categories of work and consumption changed practically overnight for a considerable proportion of the world's population. Yet, this event became only an obscure... (More)
- As a social change, the sudden collapse of communism1 should well be remembered as one of the most formative events of the 20th century. As a political transformation, it caused an initial rush of euphoria within the 'victorious' West and a wave of hope followed by disillusionment for hundreds of millions in the newly ‘democratic’ sphere. As an economic transformation, its effects were even more tangible, for they implied changes within everyday life through the shift from a centrally planned to a market economy. The rules, opportunities, and challenges presented by the basic categories of work and consumption changed practically overnight for a considerable proportion of the world's population. Yet, this event became only an obscure specialization of sociological inquiry. This disappointment is sharpened by the fact that there is, of course, a vast history of
sociological thinking about the connection between economy and sociality. Durkheim and Tönnies, Weber, Marx and Polanyi, and Simmel, to name a few, spent their careers on related questions. We teach their ideas in our universities as our 'classical theory,' yet when the collapse of communism occurred before our eyes, the event, for the most part, was not translated on a wide scale into research questions in relation to these ideas it so obviously applies to. To frame it another way, while there is a history of discussion about economic change, specifically in connection to what might loosely be defined here as
individualization of human sociality, a contemporary application of these thoughts to capitalism is nearly absent. This absence is odd in light of the recent collapse of communism, presumably giving us the opportunity to empirically explore such ideas.
This project jumps into the gap outlined above by examining whether the economic transformation to capitalism has generated tensions within the sociality of subjects who experience it through making them more self-oriented, materialistic, and rationalistic. For the task, I have chosen three very different post-communist locations (Shanghai, China;
Moscow, Russia; and Leipzig, Eastern Germany) and propose that - in light of their profound differences across nearly every dimension - a hypothetical similarity of growing self-centeredness in the last 15-20 years in all three should be linked to their other similarity, the fact that they each experienced a recent transition from centrally planned to
capitalist free-market economic culture. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5152617
- author
- Swader, Christopher LU
- supervisor
- opponent
-
- Wingens, Matthias, University of Bremen
- Reiter, Herwig, University of Bremen
- Rogge, Benedikt, University of Bremen
- Schunck, Reinhard, University of Bremen
- Weymann, Ansgar, University of Bremen
- Mau, Steffen, University of Bremen
- Mortimer, Jeylan, University of Minnesota
- publishing date
- 2008
- type
- Thesis
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- capitalism, post-communism, post-socialism, values, family, friendship, morality, economic culture, materialism, individualization
- publisher
- University of Bremen
- defense location
- University of Bremen, Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences
- defense date
- 2008-12-10 13:00:00
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- a79be551-1ffb-4ab0-98c1-d76623ca1565 (old id 5152617)
- alternative location
- http://d-nb.info/991857364/34
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 10:02:01
- date last changed
- 2020-05-19 16:43:56
@phdthesis{a79be551-1ffb-4ab0-98c1-d76623ca1565,
abstract = {{As a social change, the sudden collapse of communism1 should well be remembered as one of the most formative events of the 20th century. As a political transformation, it caused an initial rush of euphoria within the 'victorious' West and a wave of hope followed by disillusionment for hundreds of millions in the newly ‘democratic’ sphere. As an economic transformation, its effects were even more tangible, for they implied changes within everyday life through the shift from a centrally planned to a market economy. The rules, opportunities, and challenges presented by the basic categories of work and consumption changed practically overnight for a considerable proportion of the world's population. Yet, this event became only an obscure specialization of sociological inquiry. This disappointment is sharpened by the fact that there is, of course, a vast history of<br/><br>
sociological thinking about the connection between economy and sociality. Durkheim and Tönnies, Weber, Marx and Polanyi, and Simmel, to name a few, spent their careers on related questions. We teach their ideas in our universities as our 'classical theory,' yet when the collapse of communism occurred before our eyes, the event, for the most part, was not translated on a wide scale into research questions in relation to these ideas it so obviously applies to. To frame it another way, while there is a history of discussion about economic change, specifically in connection to what might loosely be defined here as<br/><br>
individualization of human sociality, a contemporary application of these thoughts to capitalism is nearly absent. This absence is odd in light of the recent collapse of communism, presumably giving us the opportunity to empirically explore such ideas.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
This project jumps into the gap outlined above by examining whether the economic transformation to capitalism has generated tensions within the sociality of subjects who experience it through making them more self-oriented, materialistic, and rationalistic. For the task, I have chosen three very different post-communist locations (Shanghai, China;<br/><br>
Moscow, Russia; and Leipzig, Eastern Germany) and propose that - in light of their profound differences across nearly every dimension - a hypothetical similarity of growing self-centeredness in the last 15-20 years in all three should be linked to their other similarity, the fact that they each experienced a recent transition from centrally planned to<br/><br>
capitalist free-market economic culture.}},
author = {{Swader, Christopher}},
keywords = {{capitalism; post-communism; post-socialism; values; family; friendship; morality; economic culture; materialism; individualization}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{University of Bremen}},
title = {{Transformation to a Market Economy and Changing Social Values in China, Russia, and Eastern Germany}},
url = {{http://d-nb.info/991857364/34}},
year = {{2008}},
}