Advanced

Desire and Justice : Levinas and Heschel on Human and Divine Pathos

Svenungsson, Jayne LU (2011) In Saving Desire : The Seduction of Christian Theology p.164-189
Abstract
The article investigates notions of subjectivity, pathos, desire and God in the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas and Abraham Heschel. By bringing the two philosophers into dialogue, the article aims to question Levinas’ conviction that the idea of a personal God, characterized by “divine pathos,” is a mythological remnant which unavoidably leads the subject into idolatry. Furthermore, it challenges the assumption, also held by Levinas, that a God who not only can be desired by human beings, but who is also a desiring God, necessarily puts us at the risk of disregarding our fellow human beings. Pushing this assumption to its limits, one can even ask whether the proposed redirection of the desire for God towards the other human being does... (More)
The article investigates notions of subjectivity, pathos, desire and God in the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas and Abraham Heschel. By bringing the two philosophers into dialogue, the article aims to question Levinas’ conviction that the idea of a personal God, characterized by “divine pathos,” is a mythological remnant which unavoidably leads the subject into idolatry. Furthermore, it challenges the assumption, also held by Levinas, that a God who not only can be desired by human beings, but who is also a desiring God, necessarily puts us at the risk of disregarding our fellow human beings. Pushing this assumption to its limits, one can even ask whether the proposed redirection of the desire for God towards the other human being does not imply the risk of making the other person – the neighbor – an idol, and thereby deceiving her or him in a more intricate – but no less malign – way. Finally, the article suggests that part of the problem with Levinas’ assumption resides in his understanding of the nature of desire, more precisely, in his belief that there is such a thing as a non-erotic, “pure” metaphysical desire. It is argued that in order to attain a richer understanding of divine-human (but also of intrahuman) interrelatedness, it is necessary to recognize the unruly, erotic or even “impure” nature of desire. In this recognition lies the key to what can be termed, with inspiration from Heschel, a “theology of pathos.” (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
justice, God, pathos, subectivity, desire, phenomenology
in
Saving Desire : The Seduction of Christian Theology
editor
Shults, LeRon and Henriksen, Jan-Olav
pages
164 - 189
publisher
William B. Eerdmans
ISBN
9780802866264
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
08e0d0cd-3c0f-4829-be30-0e20b422ac66 (old id 8728006)
date added to LUP
2016-02-22 08:37:03
date last changed
2016-06-29 09:12:30
@misc{08e0d0cd-3c0f-4829-be30-0e20b422ac66,
  abstract     = {The article investigates notions of subjectivity, pathos, desire and God in the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas and Abraham Heschel. By bringing the two philosophers into dialogue, the article aims to question Levinas’ conviction that the idea of a personal God, characterized by “divine pathos,” is a mythological remnant which unavoidably leads the subject into idolatry. Furthermore, it challenges the assumption, also held by Levinas, that a God who not only can be desired by human beings, but who is also a desiring God, necessarily puts us at the risk of disregarding our fellow human beings. Pushing this assumption to its limits, one can even ask whether the proposed redirection of the desire for God towards the other human being does not imply the risk of making the other person – the neighbor – an idol, and thereby deceiving her or him in a more intricate – but no less malign – way. Finally, the article suggests that part of the problem with Levinas’ assumption resides in his understanding of the nature of desire, more precisely, in his belief that there is such a thing as a non-erotic, “pure” metaphysical desire. It is argued that in order to attain a richer understanding of divine-human (but also of intrahuman) interrelatedness, it is necessary to recognize the unruly, erotic or even “impure” nature of desire. In this recognition lies the key to what can be termed, with inspiration from Heschel, a “theology of pathos.”},
  author       = {Svenungsson, Jayne},
  editor       = {Shults, LeRon and Henriksen, Jan-Olav},
  isbn         = {9780802866264},
  keyword      = {justice,God,pathos,subectivity,desire,phenomenology},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {164--189},
  publisher    = {ARRAY(0x995a9d0)},
  series       = {Saving Desire : The Seduction of Christian Theology},
  title        = {Desire and Justice : Levinas and Heschel on Human and Divine Pathos},
  year         = {2011},
}