Ändamålet helgar medlen?
(2010) FKVK01 20101Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- The essays purpose is to highlight the complexity of illicit weapons and it´s usage during conflicts that can be argued as just. The criteria’s of Jus in Bellum and Jus ad Bellum from the Just War theory is used to examine if conflicts containing illicit weapons can be argued as just. Apart from the theories view on what is just the illicit arms trade and the UN: s efforts to combat the arms trade are topics within this essay. Examples of conflicts fought with illicit arms creates a base for a discussion if illicit arms can be a part of a just war and thereby justified, or not. The examples also show that the arms embargo as a tool of the UN is problematic. The summery of the essay contains arguments that the Just War theory should be... (More)
- The essays purpose is to highlight the complexity of illicit weapons and it´s usage during conflicts that can be argued as just. The criteria’s of Jus in Bellum and Jus ad Bellum from the Just War theory is used to examine if conflicts containing illicit weapons can be argued as just. Apart from the theories view on what is just the illicit arms trade and the UN: s efforts to combat the arms trade are topics within this essay. Examples of conflicts fought with illicit arms creates a base for a discussion if illicit arms can be a part of a just war and thereby justified, or not. The examples also show that the arms embargo as a tool of the UN is problematic. The summery of the essay contains arguments that the Just War theory should be further developed to contain the factor of illicit arms, as well as two drafts of this possible adding. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1609256
- author
- Aringer, Martin LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- En diskussion om illegala vapen kan rättfärdigas inom rättfärdiga krig
- course
- FKVK01 20101
- year
- 2010
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- rättfärdiga krig, illegala vapen, vapenembargo, FN, självförsvar
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 1609256
- date added to LUP
- 2010-06-29 12:55:55
- date last changed
- 2015-12-14 13:34:37
@misc{1609256, abstract = {{The essays purpose is to highlight the complexity of illicit weapons and it´s usage during conflicts that can be argued as just. The criteria’s of Jus in Bellum and Jus ad Bellum from the Just War theory is used to examine if conflicts containing illicit weapons can be argued as just. Apart from the theories view on what is just the illicit arms trade and the UN: s efforts to combat the arms trade are topics within this essay. Examples of conflicts fought with illicit arms creates a base for a discussion if illicit arms can be a part of a just war and thereby justified, or not. The examples also show that the arms embargo as a tool of the UN is problematic. The summery of the essay contains arguments that the Just War theory should be further developed to contain the factor of illicit arms, as well as two drafts of this possible adding.}}, author = {{Aringer, Martin}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Ändamålet helgar medlen?}}, year = {{2010}}, }