The term "Employee" as interpreted by the national courts in Sweden and England for the purpose of eligibility in respect of an Unfair Dismissal Claim
(2013) JURM01 20131Department of Law
- Abstract
- A discussion on whether different national interpretations sit comfortably with the rationale for the uniform Court of Justice term "worker" and whether this situation can be justified in the light of the potential unlevelling of the internal market and Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/3789353
- author
- Maurin, Elin LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- JURM01 20131
- year
- 2013
- type
- H3 - Professional qualifications (4 Years - )
- subject
- keywords
- employment, employee, worker, Sweden, England, EU, Court of Justice, interpretation, definition
- language
- English
- id
- 3789353
- date added to LUP
- 2013-05-22 15:42:03
- date last changed
- 2013-05-22 15:42:03
@misc{3789353, abstract = {{A discussion on whether different national interpretations sit comfortably with the rationale for the uniform Court of Justice term "worker" and whether this situation can be justified in the light of the potential unlevelling of the internal market and Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights}}, author = {{Maurin, Elin}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{The term "Employee" as interpreted by the national courts in Sweden and England for the purpose of eligibility in respect of an Unfair Dismissal Claim}}, year = {{2013}}, }