Questioning the tunnel vision : Assessing the frames and governance of California’s WaterFix megaproject
(2017) In Master Thesis Series in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science MESM02 20171LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
- Abstract
- Over the last century, large-scale water megaprojects have become a globally widespread method of addressing water scarcity by moving water from areas of water surplus to deficit. The U.S. state of California is a megaproject pioneer, having constructed two infrastructural systems in the mid-1900s that transfer water as far as 640 kilometers to satisfy agricultural and urban growth. While these projects have provided economic and social benefits, these gains have come at substantial ecological cost while being unevenly distributed across society. California’s recent proposal to build a new megaproject called WaterFix is therefore puzzling: why does the government continue to propose megaprojects despite their known social and ecological... (More)
- Over the last century, large-scale water megaprojects have become a globally widespread method of addressing water scarcity by moving water from areas of water surplus to deficit. The U.S. state of California is a megaproject pioneer, having constructed two infrastructural systems in the mid-1900s that transfer water as far as 640 kilometers to satisfy agricultural and urban growth. While these projects have provided economic and social benefits, these gains have come at substantial ecological cost while being unevenly distributed across society. California’s recent proposal to build a new megaproject called WaterFix is therefore puzzling: why does the government continue to propose megaprojects despite their known social and ecological consequences? Looking through the lenses of political ecology, frame theory, and related concepts of governance, I answer this question via the WaterFix case to assess the sustainability outcomes potentially produced by the ideas (frames) and governance mechanisms underlying the project’s proposal. Via dual streams of investigation—frame and interview analysis—I conclude that the government’s very conceptualizations of problems and solutions are problematic for long-term sustainability. This is because they lead to a privileging of economic rather than environmental or collective interest, while they promote a techno-scientific logic that depoliticizes decision-making. Furthermore, unsustainable solutions like megaprojects are seen as economically and politically favorable due to the influence of financial incentives, undemocratic processes, and other mechanisms of governance. Government frames and governance mechanisms are therefore found to be both influential and interrelated, with frames having a more influential role in shaping not only governance arrangements, but how societal solutions are sought. Consequently, frames merit special attention in further academic research and practical decision-making, particularly in contexts in which similar large-scale infrastructure or governance arrangements exist or are planned. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8922532
- author
- Scarampi, Philip LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- MESM02 20171
- year
- 2017
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- sustainability science, political ecology, water megaprojects, governance, frames, California
- publication/series
- Master Thesis Series in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science
- report number
- 2017:044
- language
- English
- id
- 8922532
- date added to LUP
- 2017-08-18 01:43:55
- date last changed
- 2017-09-04 13:21:31
@misc{8922532,
abstract = {{Over the last century, large-scale water megaprojects have become a globally widespread method of addressing water scarcity by moving water from areas of water surplus to deficit. The U.S. state of California is a megaproject pioneer, having constructed two infrastructural systems in the mid-1900s that transfer water as far as 640 kilometers to satisfy agricultural and urban growth. While these projects have provided economic and social benefits, these gains have come at substantial ecological cost while being unevenly distributed across society. California’s recent proposal to build a new megaproject called WaterFix is therefore puzzling: why does the government continue to propose megaprojects despite their known social and ecological consequences? Looking through the lenses of political ecology, frame theory, and related concepts of governance, I answer this question via the WaterFix case to assess the sustainability outcomes potentially produced by the ideas (frames) and governance mechanisms underlying the project’s proposal. Via dual streams of investigation—frame and interview analysis—I conclude that the government’s very conceptualizations of problems and solutions are problematic for long-term sustainability. This is because they lead to a privileging of economic rather than environmental or collective interest, while they promote a techno-scientific logic that depoliticizes decision-making. Furthermore, unsustainable solutions like megaprojects are seen as economically and politically favorable due to the influence of financial incentives, undemocratic processes, and other mechanisms of governance. Government frames and governance mechanisms are therefore found to be both influential and interrelated, with frames having a more influential role in shaping not only governance arrangements, but how societal solutions are sought. Consequently, frames merit special attention in further academic research and practical decision-making, particularly in contexts in which similar large-scale infrastructure or governance arrangements exist or are planned.}},
author = {{Scarampi, Philip}},
language = {{eng}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
series = {{Master Thesis Series in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science}},
title = {{Questioning the tunnel vision : Assessing the frames and governance of California’s WaterFix megaproject}},
year = {{2017}},
}