Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Exploring the Relationship Between Personality, Gender and Preferences in Contemporary Office Workspace Design

O'Reilly, Peter LU (2019) PSYP01 20181
Department of Psychology
Abstract
Objective: The study explores office workspace design preferences, and their psychological antecedents (personality and gender), among a sample of professionals before they have commenced work in an office environment – an approach not previously undertaken. Background: The physical environment of an office workspace and its design characteristics are important to employees’ psychological well-being. Organisations are increasingly adopting new office design concepts – known as Lean / Activity Based Working (ABW) / Flex-offices, however, there is a lack of research on the appropriateness and effect of these types of workspaces with the few studies conducted reporting deleterious well-being consequences. Method: Participants (n=199)... (More)
Objective: The study explores office workspace design preferences, and their psychological antecedents (personality and gender), among a sample of professionals before they have commenced work in an office environment – an approach not previously undertaken. Background: The physical environment of an office workspace and its design characteristics are important to employees’ psychological well-being. Organisations are increasingly adopting new office design concepts – known as Lean / Activity Based Working (ABW) / Flex-offices, however, there is a lack of research on the appropriateness and effect of these types of workspaces with the few studies conducted reporting deleterious well-being consequences. Method: Participants (n=199) completed the Authenticity Scale, the HEXACO MiniIPIP6, and instruments designed to measure preference for office type, workspace personalization and biophilia / nature in office workspaces. The battery of questionnaires was administered via an online form distributed to four universities in Sweden. Results: 14.57% of participants preferred the Lean / ABW / Flex-office compared with 81.92% preferring other office types (p<0.000). Participants expressed a preference for biophilia and nature in the office (81.41%) over those that did not (p<0.000). Binary logistic regression revealed that HEXACO traits were able to significantly predict participant preference for non-Flex offices over Flex-offices. Authenticity yielded no significant findings. One-way ANOVA analyses revealed an unexpected gender effect with females exhibiting greater proclivity for biophilia / nature in the office (F (1, 197) = 6.67, p = 0.011, η2= 0.03), and supported previous research in respect to gender and personalization F (1, 197) = 14.34, p = 0.000, η2= 0.07). Conclusion: Future office-based professionals appear to exhibit a priori office workspace design preferences consistent with research identifying good psycho-environmental design but contrasting with contemporary organisational practise. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
O'Reilly, Peter LU
supervisor
organization
course
PSYP01 20181
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Biophilia, Environmental Psychology, Evolutionary Workspaces, Flex-office, Gender, Green Enriched Office, Lean office, Office Design Preference, Personality, Self-Determination Theory
language
English
id
8969061
date added to LUP
2019-02-06 09:30:26
date last changed
2019-10-14 12:33:55
@misc{8969061,
  abstract     = {{Objective: The study explores office workspace design preferences, and their psychological antecedents (personality and gender), among a sample of professionals before they have commenced work in an office environment – an approach not previously undertaken. Background: The physical environment of an office workspace and its design characteristics are important to employees’ psychological well-being. Organisations are increasingly adopting new office design concepts – known as Lean / Activity Based Working (ABW) / Flex-offices, however, there is a lack of research on the appropriateness and effect of these types of workspaces with the few studies conducted reporting deleterious well-being consequences. Method: Participants (n=199) completed the Authenticity Scale, the HEXACO MiniIPIP6, and instruments designed to measure preference for office type, workspace personalization and biophilia / nature in office workspaces. The battery of questionnaires was administered via an online form distributed to four universities in Sweden. Results: 14.57% of participants preferred the Lean / ABW / Flex-office compared with 81.92% preferring other office types (p<0.000). Participants expressed a preference for biophilia and nature in the office (81.41%) over those that did not (p<0.000). Binary logistic regression revealed that HEXACO traits were able to significantly predict participant preference for non-Flex offices over Flex-offices. Authenticity yielded no significant findings. One-way ANOVA analyses revealed an unexpected gender effect with females exhibiting greater proclivity for biophilia / nature in the office (F (1, 197) = 6.67, p = 0.011, η2= 0.03), and supported previous research in respect to gender and personalization F (1, 197) = 14.34, p = 0.000, η2= 0.07). Conclusion: Future office-based professionals appear to exhibit a priori office workspace design preferences consistent with research identifying good psycho-environmental design but contrasting with contemporary organisational practise.}},
  author       = {{O'Reilly, Peter}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Exploring the Relationship Between Personality, Gender and Preferences in Contemporary Office Workspace Design}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}