Banning Plastic Straw by Straw: Why California needs a more harmonized approach to plastics management
(2020) In IIIEE Master Thesis IMEM01 20201The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics
- Abstract
- Over 150 local communities in California have implemented plastic product bans as a way to decrease stress on landfills, reduce non-recyclable materials, and manage litter. Plastic product bans such as plastic bags, polystyrene, or single-use plastics, are used to address both local (e.g. litter reduction or community aesthetics), and global (e.g. microplastic pollution or wildlife entanglement) problematizations of plastic waste. As an environmental leader within the United States, California is positioned to lead other states towards effective policy implementation to mitigate the effects of plastic waste and pollution. However, local agencies bear the burden of collecting, sorting, and sometimes, selling recyclables in a rapidly closing... (More)
- Over 150 local communities in California have implemented plastic product bans as a way to decrease stress on landfills, reduce non-recyclable materials, and manage litter. Plastic product bans such as plastic bags, polystyrene, or single-use plastics, are used to address both local (e.g. litter reduction or community aesthetics), and global (e.g. microplastic pollution or wildlife entanglement) problematizations of plastic waste. As an environmental leader within the United States, California is positioned to lead other states towards effective policy implementation to mitigate the effects of plastic waste and pollution. However, local agencies bear the burden of collecting, sorting, and sometimes, selling recyclables in a rapidly closing global market. A clear consensus on policy goals is needed to understand if plastic bans are a successful means of solving the plastic pollution and waste crisis in the State. This thesis aims to understand the motivations and anticipated effects of local plastic bans in California in order to understand and analyze the justification for a statewide, harmonized plastics strategy. Through the use of in-depth interviews and policy document analysis this qualitative study uses policy diffusion theories to outline the motivations for local agencies to implement bans, thematic content analysis to determine anticipated effects, and policy harmonization theory to create a framework for a California “plastics playbook” which outlines recommended actions on a State level to more effectively address plastic waste and pollution. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9017486
- author
- Adell, Rachel LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- IMEM01 20201
- year
- 2020
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- publication/series
- IIIEE Master Thesis
- report number
- 2020:01
- ISSN
- 1401-9191
- language
- English
- id
- 9017486
- date added to LUP
- 2020-06-15 09:23:23
- date last changed
- 2020-06-15 09:23:23
@misc{9017486, abstract = {{Over 150 local communities in California have implemented plastic product bans as a way to decrease stress on landfills, reduce non-recyclable materials, and manage litter. Plastic product bans such as plastic bags, polystyrene, or single-use plastics, are used to address both local (e.g. litter reduction or community aesthetics), and global (e.g. microplastic pollution or wildlife entanglement) problematizations of plastic waste. As an environmental leader within the United States, California is positioned to lead other states towards effective policy implementation to mitigate the effects of plastic waste and pollution. However, local agencies bear the burden of collecting, sorting, and sometimes, selling recyclables in a rapidly closing global market. A clear consensus on policy goals is needed to understand if plastic bans are a successful means of solving the plastic pollution and waste crisis in the State. This thesis aims to understand the motivations and anticipated effects of local plastic bans in California in order to understand and analyze the justification for a statewide, harmonized plastics strategy. Through the use of in-depth interviews and policy document analysis this qualitative study uses policy diffusion theories to outline the motivations for local agencies to implement bans, thematic content analysis to determine anticipated effects, and policy harmonization theory to create a framework for a California “plastics playbook” which outlines recommended actions on a State level to more effectively address plastic waste and pollution.}}, author = {{Adell, Rachel}}, issn = {{1401-9191}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, series = {{IIIEE Master Thesis}}, title = {{Banning Plastic Straw by Straw: Why California needs a more harmonized approach to plastics management}}, year = {{2020}}, }