Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

From "the Will to Improve" to "the Will to Transform": Some Promises & Challenges of Sida's Multidimensional Poverty Analysis (MDPA) Framework in Bolivia

Solarte Espinosa, Jonathan LU (2021) MIDM19 20211
Department of Human Geography
LUMID International Master programme in applied International Development and Management
Abstract
Objectives: This study sets out to answer the following research questions:

1. How do Sida and CEDLA problematize poverty and what does this reveal about their underlying development paradigms?

2. What are some of the key promises and challenges of Sida and CEDLA’s differing understandings of capitalism for their use of the MDPA framework in Bolivia?

The key areas of focus are the organizations Sida and CEDLA, Sida’s Multidimensional Poverty Analysis (MDPA) framework, and in particular, its use within the context of Bolivia.

Methods: This paper presents a qualitative case study of the above topics with recourse to semi-structured and paired depth interviews as well as a focus group, with Sida informants, in both Sweden and... (More)
Objectives: This study sets out to answer the following research questions:

1. How do Sida and CEDLA problematize poverty and what does this reveal about their underlying development paradigms?

2. What are some of the key promises and challenges of Sida and CEDLA’s differing understandings of capitalism for their use of the MDPA framework in Bolivia?

The key areas of focus are the organizations Sida and CEDLA, Sida’s Multidimensional Poverty Analysis (MDPA) framework, and in particular, its use within the context of Bolivia.

Methods: This paper presents a qualitative case study of the above topics with recourse to semi-structured and paired depth interviews as well as a focus group, with Sida informants, in both Sweden and Latin America, as well as two non-Sida participants from a Sida-funded Bolivian think tank called CEDLA. The paper, moreover, uses a combination of post-structuralist concepts, such as discourse analysis, and materialist notions regarding Elite Development Theory (EDT) versus Labor-Centered Development (LCD), in order to answer the aforementioned research questions.

Principal findings: Sida, it turns out, re-problematizes poverty as multidimensional, in response to earlier unidimensional understandings of poverty, such as the World Bank’s reductive focus on resource poverty, to the exclusion of the environmental, social, and political dimensions and contexts, among others. It does so, in part, in response to SDG 1’s exhortation to “end poverty in all its forms.” Sida’s discourses on poverty have an underlying liberal development paradigm, influenced by Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach. CEDLA, on the other hand, understands poverty through a materialist lens, as caused by the structural inequalities and exploitative dynamics inherent to global capitalism. While Sida tends to have more of an EDT, CEDLA has a perspective which could be considered representative of LCD. Sida is driven by “the will to improve,” whereas CEDLA is driven by “the will to transform.” Both organizations should continue their mutually-beneficial development cooperation. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Solarte Espinosa, Jonathan LU
supervisor
organization
course
MIDM19 20211
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Sida, Sweden, Latin America, Bolivia, MDPA, multidimensional poverty, poverty reduction, development discourses, development paradigms, power, capitalism, donors, ODA
language
English
id
9066442
date added to LUP
2021-10-04 08:49:26
date last changed
2021-11-29 08:38:20
@misc{9066442,
  abstract     = {{Objectives: This study sets out to answer the following research questions:
 
1. How do Sida and CEDLA problematize poverty and what does this reveal about their underlying development paradigms?

2. What are some of the key promises and challenges of Sida and CEDLA’s differing understandings of capitalism for their use of the MDPA framework in Bolivia?

The key areas of focus are the organizations Sida and CEDLA, Sida’s Multidimensional Poverty Analysis (MDPA) framework, and in particular, its use within the context of Bolivia.

Methods: This paper presents a qualitative case study of the above topics with recourse to semi-structured and paired depth interviews as well as a focus group, with Sida informants, in both Sweden and Latin America, as well as two non-Sida participants from a Sida-funded Bolivian think tank called CEDLA. The paper, moreover, uses a combination of post-structuralist concepts, such as discourse analysis, and materialist notions regarding Elite Development Theory (EDT) versus Labor-Centered Development (LCD), in order to answer the aforementioned research questions.

Principal findings: Sida, it turns out, re-problematizes poverty as multidimensional, in response to earlier unidimensional understandings of poverty, such as the World Bank’s reductive focus on resource poverty, to the exclusion of the environmental, social, and political dimensions and contexts, among others. It does so, in part, in response to SDG 1’s exhortation to “end poverty in all its forms.” Sida’s discourses on poverty have an underlying liberal development paradigm, influenced by Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach. CEDLA, on the other hand, understands poverty through a materialist lens, as caused by the structural inequalities and exploitative dynamics inherent to global capitalism. While Sida tends to have more of an EDT, CEDLA has a perspective which could be considered representative of LCD. Sida is driven by “the will to improve,” whereas CEDLA is driven by “the will to transform.” Both organizations should continue their mutually-beneficial development cooperation.}},
  author       = {{Solarte Espinosa, Jonathan}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{From "the Will to Improve" to "the Will to Transform": Some Promises & Challenges of Sida's Multidimensional Poverty Analysis (MDPA) Framework in Bolivia}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}