Transforming Feminist Values into Policies: A Critical Analysis of Germany’s Feminist Foreign Policy Process
(2023) MRSM15 20231Human Rights Studies
- Abstract
- The increase of feminist foreign policy (FFP) declarations globally has provoked a vigilant
scrutiny of these policies, especially their alignment with transformative, postcolonial, and
intersectional feminisms.
Contributing to existing scholarship on FFPs, this thesis explores the establishment of FFP
in Germany from consultation process to final guidelines. Using a multidimensional
Critical Discourse Analysis, it aims to investigate concealed political motivations and
explores how feminist values were translated into the process and the final strategy. There
is not only little research on the German case due to its novelty but also a void in studying
specifically the feminist character of corresponding processes. Due to Germany’s... (More) - The increase of feminist foreign policy (FFP) declarations globally has provoked a vigilant
scrutiny of these policies, especially their alignment with transformative, postcolonial, and
intersectional feminisms.
Contributing to existing scholarship on FFPs, this thesis explores the establishment of FFP
in Germany from consultation process to final guidelines. Using a multidimensional
Critical Discourse Analysis, it aims to investigate concealed political motivations and
explores how feminist values were translated into the process and the final strategy. There
is not only little research on the German case due to its novelty but also a void in studying
specifically the feminist character of corresponding processes. Due to Germany’s colonial
legacy and other distinct positionalities, the declaration comes with obligations.
This research is guided by postcolonial and intersectional feminist theories. The data
consists of semi-structured interviews and the FFP guideline document. The results confirm
that particularly during the creation of human rights policies – such as FFPs - civil society
expertise as well as marginalized people’s lived experiences are crucial in realizing
transformative outcomes. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9140129
- author
- Holos, Milena LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- MRSM15 20231
- year
- 2023
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- Feminist Foreign Policy, Critical Discourse Analysis, feminism, postcolonial theory, intersectional theory, civil society, human rights policies
- language
- English
- id
- 9140129
- date added to LUP
- 2024-12-04 07:48:28
- date last changed
- 2024-12-04 07:48:28
@misc{9140129, abstract = {{The increase of feminist foreign policy (FFP) declarations globally has provoked a vigilant scrutiny of these policies, especially their alignment with transformative, postcolonial, and intersectional feminisms. Contributing to existing scholarship on FFPs, this thesis explores the establishment of FFP in Germany from consultation process to final guidelines. Using a multidimensional Critical Discourse Analysis, it aims to investigate concealed political motivations and explores how feminist values were translated into the process and the final strategy. There is not only little research on the German case due to its novelty but also a void in studying specifically the feminist character of corresponding processes. Due to Germany’s colonial legacy and other distinct positionalities, the declaration comes with obligations. This research is guided by postcolonial and intersectional feminist theories. The data consists of semi-structured interviews and the FFP guideline document. The results confirm that particularly during the creation of human rights policies – such as FFPs - civil society expertise as well as marginalized people’s lived experiences are crucial in realizing transformative outcomes.}}, author = {{Holos, Milena}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Transforming Feminist Values into Policies: A Critical Analysis of Germany’s Feminist Foreign Policy Process}}, year = {{2023}}, }