Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Online Multi-objective Optimisation of MAX IV Electron Storage Ring: A genetic algorithm approach to optimising lifetime and injection efficiency of an electron storage ring

Yanartas, Ali Kuzey LU (2024) FYSK04 20241
Department of Physics
Synchrotron Radiation Research
Abstract
The aim of this bachelor thesis is to enhance the performance of one of the electron storage rings at MAX IV. The performance is primarily evaluated based on the lifetime and injection efficiency of the ring. Improving these variables will enable smoother machine operation by providing faster injections and reducing background radiation during injections. Consequently, this optimisation project is valuable in terms of the safety and operations of MAX IV. A genetic algorithm approach was used for the optimisation, and the selected algorithm was the Non-dominated Sorting Algorithm II. The algorithm controlled a family of sextupoles in the ring to improve the dynamic aperture and momentum acceptance. Theoretically, these improvements should... (More)
The aim of this bachelor thesis is to enhance the performance of one of the electron storage rings at MAX IV. The performance is primarily evaluated based on the lifetime and injection efficiency of the ring. Improving these variables will enable smoother machine operation by providing faster injections and reducing background radiation during injections. Consequently, this optimisation project is valuable in terms of the safety and operations of MAX IV. A genetic algorithm approach was used for the optimisation, and the selected algorithm was the Non-dominated Sorting Algorithm II. The algorithm controlled a family of sextupoles in the ring to improve the dynamic aperture and momentum acceptance. Theoretically, these improvements should extend the beam lifetime and elevate the injection efficiency. The algorithm was successful in finding superior sextupole configurations compared to the present conditions of the ring. However, due to the magnetic hysteresis, it was deemed challenging to reproduce these solutions. Despite the issues with hysteresis and, therefore, the reproducibility of solutions, it was demonstrated that the algorithm was able to recover the key performance variables of the lattice, particularly in a poorly set machine. (Less)
Popular Abstract
Since the dawn of time, we humans have been drawn heavily to light, which enabled us to observe our environment. Our profound curiosity in understanding the universe we live in set us apart from other living creatures and resulted in beautiful endeavours such as science, arts and religion. Over time, we have realized that there are things in nature that are either too small or too far away to be observed with the naked eye. So, began a long-lasting search for tools to observe the delicate details of our universe. The first ever microscope was invented around 1600 by Zacharias Janssen, and since then, the research tools have come a long way. Nowadays, large-scale particle accelerators are used for conducting research. Essentially, these are... (More)
Since the dawn of time, we humans have been drawn heavily to light, which enabled us to observe our environment. Our profound curiosity in understanding the universe we live in set us apart from other living creatures and resulted in beautiful endeavours such as science, arts and religion. Over time, we have realized that there are things in nature that are either too small or too far away to be observed with the naked eye. So, began a long-lasting search for tools to observe the delicate details of our universe. The first ever microscope was invented around 1600 by Zacharias Janssen, and since then, the research tools have come a long way. Nowadays, large-scale particle accelerators are used for conducting research. Essentially, these are bigger microscopes that allow us to see even smaller things.

MAX IV is a particle accelerator located in a modest town in the South of Sweden, and it is one of the brightest light sources we have in the world at the moment. This facility attracts 1700 users annually, a number which is only expected to rise in the following years. In MAX IV, there is a linear accelerator, which accelerates electrons to near the speed of light and then injects them into the two electron storage rings, the smaller one called R1 and the bigger ring called R3. As you may guess, these storage rings are circular structures, kind of like massive doughnuts that cost millions to build. The path of injected electrons is bent by powerful magnets, causing them to shoot out X-rays. Researchers from all around the world make a worthy trip to MAX IV to use high-quality X-ray light for practices such as X-ray spectroscopy, scattering & diffraction, and imaging techniques.

The different types and strengths of magnets work in harmony in the electron storage rings. Dipole magnets bend the electrons through the curved structure of the electron storage ring meanwhile, the quadruple magnets squeeze the electrons together, ensuring a well-confined stream of electrons. Sextupole magnets play a crucial role in correcting for the imperfections caused by the other magnets in the ring. It is almost like tuning a guitar, a delicate business that can enhance the performance of the electron storage ring.

The performance of an electron storage ring can be measured by the lifetime of the electrons circulating in the ring and the electron injection efficiency. The former measures how long the electrons can survive in the ring, while the latter compares the amount of electrons that made it into the ring during injection to the amount of electrons that tried to get in. If we imagine the electron storage ring as a roundabout, the lifetime tells us how long the cars spend in the roundabout, whereas
the injection efficiency tells us how fast and efficiently we can welcome new cars into the roundabout.

In this project, we are using a genetic algorithm written in Python language, to find the optimal current configurations of the sextupole magnets in order to optimise the lifetime and the injection efficiency of the small electron storage ring, R1. The algorithm will attempt different configurations of sextupole magnets and select the best-performing options. This process is similar to natural selection in nature, where only the strongest survive as the generations evolve. The optimisation process will directly benefit the users of the machine and their studies. This will then indirectly help the general public since the scientific discoveries will speed up the invention and design of new tools and gears. Moreover, if the optimisation process is successful and replicable, this process can also be utilised in other facilities worldwide. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Yanartas, Ali Kuzey LU
supervisor
organization
course
FYSK04 20241
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
MAX IV, Electron Storage Ring, Multi-objective Optimisation, Lifetime, Injection Efficiency, Genetic Algorithm, Sextupole Magnets
language
English
id
9164158
date added to LUP
2024-06-18 08:56:42
date last changed
2024-06-18 09:02:09
@misc{9164158,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this bachelor thesis is to enhance the performance of one of the electron storage rings at MAX IV. The performance is primarily evaluated based on the lifetime and injection efficiency of the ring. Improving these variables will enable smoother machine operation by providing faster injections and reducing background radiation during injections. Consequently, this optimisation project is valuable in terms of the safety and operations of MAX IV. A genetic algorithm approach was used for the optimisation, and the selected algorithm was the Non-dominated Sorting Algorithm II. The algorithm controlled a family of sextupoles in the ring to improve the dynamic aperture and momentum acceptance. Theoretically, these improvements should extend the beam lifetime and elevate the injection efficiency. The algorithm was successful in finding superior sextupole configurations compared to the present conditions of the ring. However, due to the magnetic hysteresis, it was deemed challenging to reproduce these solutions. Despite the issues with hysteresis and, therefore, the reproducibility of solutions, it was demonstrated that the algorithm was able to recover the key performance variables of the lattice, particularly in a poorly set machine.}},
  author       = {{Yanartas, Ali Kuzey}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Online Multi-objective Optimisation of MAX IV Electron Storage Ring: A genetic algorithm approach to optimising lifetime and injection efficiency of an electron storage ring}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}